Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04620434
NCT04620434UnknownNot Applicable

Improvement of the Glottic View by the Use of Video Laryngoscope

Seoul National University Hospital1 site in 1 country39 target enrollmentStarted: June 23, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
39
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
POGO (Percentage of Glottic Opening) score

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the exposure of glottis by the use of video and direct laryngoscopy.

Detailed Description

It is well known that a video laryngoscope can provide better glottic view than a direct laryngoscope. However, to date, a direct laryngoscope has been the standard equipment for tracheal intubation. Recently, it seems that use of the video laryngoscope has increased. However, the advantage of the video laryngoscope over a direct laryngoscope has not been measured quantitatively. In this study, the glottic view by the use of video laryngoscope will be compared with that of the direct laryngoscope simultaneously, by using C-MAC S-imager installed with a disposable Macintosh blade. Intubating anesthesiologists will use it as if it is a direct laryngoscope. Simultaneously, the glottic views visualized on the monitor of the video laryngoscope will be recorded and evaluated later. For quantitative comparison, the glottic view will be scored with the Percentage of glottic opening scale, for both direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy. Also, the glottic view will be compared by Cormack-Lehane grade.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Only
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients who are over 18 years old, and are planning surgeries that require general anesthesia and tracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who are not agreed to participate in the trial
  • Patients who have a poor dental condition which requires other than direct laryngoscopy
  • Patients who require rapid sequence induction technique
  • Patients with cervical spine instability

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

POGO (Percentage of Glottic Opening) score

Time Frame: during laryngoscopy

POGO (Percentage of Glottic Opening) score of the glottic view by video/direct laryngoscope during laryngoscopy without external laryngeal manipulation. (Percentage of glottic opening score, which means a better outcome at higher score: linear span from the anterior commissure to the interarytenoid notch; 0%, only interarytenoid notch seen; 100% full view of vocal cords)

Cormack-Lehane grade

Time Frame: during laryngoscopy

Cormack-Lehane grade with video/direct laryngoscope, during laryngoscopy without external laryngeal manipulation (Cormack-Lehane grade, which means a better outcome at lower score: grade 1, Full view of glottis; grade 2a, Partial view of glottis; grade 2b, Only posterior extremity of glottis or arytenoid cartilages; grade 3, Only epiglottis seen; grade 4, Neither glottis nor epiglottis seen)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cormack-Lehane grade with external laryngeal manipulation(during laryngoscopy)
  • POGO score with external laryngeal manipulation(during laryngoscopy)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dongwook Won

Associate professor

Seoul National University Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Improvement of the Glottic View by Video... | Clinical Trial