Liraglutide Effects on Memory in Healthy Subjects
- Registration Number
- NCT01550653
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Luebeck
- Brief Summary
This study examines the hypothesis, that subcutaneous administration of liraglutide, an analogue of the incretin glucagon-like peptide 1, over 5 weeks improves memory functions in healthy humans.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
- Male sex
- Age 18-35 years
- Body mass index between 19 and 25 kg/m2
- Non-smoker
Exclusion Criteria
- Receipt of any drug within 4 weeks prior to this trial
- Any known acute or chronic disease of the brain, heart, lung, kidney,liver, pancreas or gastrointestinal tract, any metabolic, endocrine or psychiatric disease.
- Brady- and Tachycardia, i.e. heart rate < 50 and > 90 beats per minute.
- Hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 150 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg).
- Hyperlipidemia (cholesterol, LDL, triglyceride > two times the upper reference limit based on analysis from the central laboratory)
- Impaired hepatic function measured as alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) > two times the upper reference limit based on analysis from the central laboratory
- Impaired renal function measured as creatinine > 120 µmol/l based on analysis from the central laboratory
- Family history of diabetes
- History of any eating disorder
- Known or suspected allergy to trial products
- History of drug or alcohol abuse within the last five years prior to screening
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Liraglutide liraglutide See "Intervention" Placebo Placebo See "Intervention"
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from Baseline in the immediate and delayed recall of a declarative memory task (word list recall) at time points indicated in "time frame" section. Day -7 (immediate Recall 1), Day 0 (Delayed Recall 1), Day 1 (Immediate Recall 2), Day 7 (Delayed Recall 2), Day 28 (Immediate Recall 3), Day 35 (Delayed Recall 3) Change from baseline in the immediate and delayed recall of an Episodic Memory Task (story recall) at the time points indicated in the "Time Frame" - section. Day -7 (immediate Recall 1), Day 0 (Delayed Recall 1), Day 28 (Immediate Recall 2), Day 35 (Delayed Recall 2) Change from baseline in performance on a two-dimensional object location task on day 1 and day 35. Day -7, Day 1, Day 35 Change from baseline in performance on a working-memory task on day 1 and day 35. Day -7, Day 1, Day 35 Digit Span Test
Change from baseline in immediate and delayed recall of a procedural memory task at the time points indicated in the "Time Frame" - section. Day -7 (immediate Recall 1), Day 0 (Delayed Recall 1), Day 28 (Immediate Recall 2), Day 35 (Delayed Recall 2) Finger tapping test
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in resting metabolic rate on day 7, 28 and 35. Day 0 , Day 7 , Day 28 , Day 35 indirect calorimetry
Change from baseline in serum/plasma concentrations of parameters involved in glucose metabolism on day 1,7,28, and 35. Day -7, 1, 7, 28, 35
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Luebeck, Department of Neuroendocrinology
🇩🇪Luebeck, Germany
University of Luebeck, Department of Neuroendocrinology🇩🇪Luebeck, Germany