跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04194827
NCT04194827招募中4 期

Adalimumab Drug Optimisation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (ADDORA): Multi-centre Open Label Randomised Controlled Trail

Reade Rheumatology Research Institute1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 267 人开始时间: 2020年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
267
试验地点
1
主要终点
Medical costs

研究概览

简要总结

Several prior studies have shown that dose reduction of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-inhibitors like adalimumab is possible in substantial number of rheumatic disease patients without an increase in disease activity. Biologic therapy is expensive, and is associated with patient burden as dose dependant risk for serious infections . A dose reduction will decrease the risk of side effects and result in substantial cost savings. Currently, most clinicians use Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to monitor dose tapering strategies. Although this approach is cost-effective, it might be improved by information on the extent of drug levels, as several studies have shown that adalimumab drug levels are associated with clinical outcome. Therefore, a study comparing dose reduction strategy using drug concentration with dose reduction strategy using disease activity is timely

详细描述

Since the introduction of biologics in rheumatology, as well as treat-to-target (measuring disease activity and adapting treatment accordingly) the prognosis of patients has improved substantially. Obviously, patient burden due to self-injection or infusion, the risk of adverse events and costs demand responsible use of these agents. Multiple studies have shown that a large proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with stable low disease activity can taper their dose or stop without relapse of disease activity. This can be done by using disease activity guided tapering. Drawbacks, however, include increased risk for short lived flares, the effort of slowly and carefully tapering, and somewhat more risk of radiographic damage due to higher mean disease activity. As most biologics are characterized by wide variation in pharmacokinetics between patients, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), i.e. dose based on serum trough concentration, might be an attractive approach to lower the dose quickly while remaining clinical efficacy. Although some data suggest that the minimal effective concentration varies between patients, we demonstrated in an earlier study that serum adalimumab concentration of 5 mg/L is enough for initial response to adalimumab. In the first phase of treatment, drug concentration must be high enough to control immunogenicity. To control disease activity after 28 weeks, lower concentrations than 5 mg/L are probably sufficient. Since around 70% of the patients have an adalimumab concentration above 5 mg/l, we assume that dose reduction to achieve these lower targets (for example direct doubling of interval in patients with levels > 10 mg/L) will result in the lowest effective drug dose. Our study group illustrated in 2018 that dose reduction by extending the dosing interval with 50% is non inferior to continuation of standard dose in patients with adalimumab levels > 8mg/L. In other words, measuring drug concentrations can help clinicians to select overexposed patients to reduce the dose of adalimumab without adversely affecting clinical efficiency. We posit that therapeutic drug monitoring can attribute to a more efficient dose reduction strategy. Since steady state drug concentrations are achieved within 16 weeks of treatment, we expect that the dose can be reduced from this point. This is earlier in treatment compared to the strategy using disease activity alone, namely after 6 months of treatment. Conceptually, such a test can improve disease activity guided dose reduction in two ways: 1) flaring caused by empirical tapering (i.e. through trial and error) below the minimal effective concentration would be avoided, and 2) patients can be directly given their minimum effective dose instead of empirical tapering, thereby saving time and drugs. Our aim is to investigate whether the use of drug levels can attribute to a more efficient dose reduction strategy of adalimumab in patients with RA. In this study we will compare costs and clinical efficiency of two dose reduction strategies: a strategy using drug concentration versus a strategy using disease activity scores. We expect that direct medical costs will be lower in the 'drug concentration guided' strategy because: 1) overexposed patient can reduce the dose more timely and, 2) adalimumab dose can be further reduced after 6 months of treatment since we posit that adalimumab concentration of 2 mg/L is sufficient to control disease.

In this multi-centre, randomised, open-label trail we will evaluate whether dose reduction of adalimumab using drug concentration can reduce medical costs compared to a strategy using disease activity scores. Furthermore we will evaluate the clinical efficiency of these two strategies.

Patients with a good or moderate EULAR response to adalimumab will be randomised to adalimumab dose reduction strategy using drug concentration or disease activity scores. Patients in the 'drug concentration guided' group will reduce adalimumab dose by prolonging the dose-interval using TDM algorithm (a new developed algorithm is used to determine the interval prolongation for each patient). The dose reduction will start at week 16 if trough drug level is higher than 5mg/L, aiming a drug level of 5mg/L in week 16 until 28 and a drug level of 2mg/L from week 28 until week 52. In the initial 16 weeks patients are treated with adalimumab at registered dose of 40mg every other week.

Patients in the 'disease activity guided' group will reduce adalimumab dose at week 28 if DAS28-CRP is lower than 2.9. This dose reduction will be attained by extending the dosing interval to every 3 weeks in weeks 28 until 40 and to every 4 weeks from week 40 until week 52.

Patients who successfully prolonged the dose interval to 40 mg every 4 weeks in the 'disease activity guided' group and patients who successfully prolonged their dose-interval and achieve a serum concentration of 2.0 mg/L in the 'drug concentration guided' group will be approached to participate to the extension phase (week 52-80). After informed consent is obtained patients will discontinue adalimumab and they will be followed up to week 80.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

During every study visit the joints of all patients will be examined for pain and swelling by a blinded nurse or physician. The number of painful and swollen joints will be used to calculate the DAS28 score, the primary outcome of the study

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Rheumatoid arthritis patient, according to ACR 1987 or ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria;
  • Starting adalimumab as the first biological therapy
  • Who has agreed to participate (written informed consent);
  • Age 18 years or older.

排除标准

  • Scheduled surgery during the follow-up of the study or other pre-planned reasons for treatment discontinuation;
  • Life expectancy shorter than follow-up period of the study;
  • Other disease that might flare if adalimumab is tapered like psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease.

研究组 & 干预措施

Concentration guided dose reducion

Experimental

Dose reduction of adalimumab will be based on adalimumab through concentration after 16 weeks of treatment with adalimumab.

干预措施: Adalimumab serum trough concentration (Diagnostic Test)

Concentration guided dose reducion

Experimental

Dose reduction of adalimumab will be based on adalimumab through concentration after 16 weeks of treatment with adalimumab.

干预措施: Adalimumab (Drug)

Disease activity quided dose reduction

Active Comparator

Dose reduction of adalimumab will be based on disease activity after 28 weeks of treatment with adalimumab

干预措施: Disease activity (Diagnostic Test)

Disease activity quided dose reduction

Active Comparator

Dose reduction of adalimumab will be based on disease activity after 28 weeks of treatment with adalimumab

干预措施: Adalimumab (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Medical costs

时间窗: 52 weeks

Direct medical costs associated with adalimumab dose reduction using drug concentration versus using disease activity scores

次要结局

  • Number of flares(at 52 and 80 weeks)
  • Indirect medical costs(at 28, 52 and 80 weeks)
  • Mean time weighted DAS28-CRP(at 16, 28, 52 and 80 weeks)
  • Direct medical costs(at week 28 and week 80)
  • Patients with DAS28-CRP<2.9(at 52 and 80 weeks)
  • Drug levels(at 4,16, 28, 40, 52 and 80 weeks)
  • Number of dose-interval shortenings(at 52 and 80 weeks)

研究者

发起方
Reade Rheumatology Research Institute
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Adalimumab Drug Optimisation in Rheumatoid Arthritis... | 临床试验