A Study of the ENSEAL® X1 Curved Jaw Tissue Sealer and Generator G11 in Thoracic, Urologic, and Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Procedures
- Conditions
- Urologic ProcedureThoracic ProcedureEar, Nose and Throat Procedure
- Registration Number
- NCT05067647
- Lead Sponsor
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the acceptable performance and safety of the ENSEAL X1 curved jaw tissue sealer and Ethicon endo-surgery generator G11 (GEN11) devices when used per the instructions for use (IFU).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 94
- Primary laparoscopic or open procedure (thoracic, urologic or ear, nose, and throat [ENT]) where at least one vessel is planned to be transected by the ENSEAL X1 curved jaw tissue sealer (ENSEAL X1) device per the Instructions for use (IFU)
- Willingness to give consent and comply with all study-related evaluations and treatment schedule
- At least 18 years of age
- Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation
- Enrollment in a concurrent interventional clinical study that could impact the study endpoints
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Vessels With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale On the day of transection (Day 0) A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with ENSEAL X1; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products). Here, the number of vessels that achieved \<=Grade 3 hemostasis was reported.
Number of Participants With at Least One Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) Baseline up to 6 weeks Device-related AEs were those having a relationship of possibly, probably, or causally. 1. Possible-The relationship with use of device was weak but cannot be ruled out completely. Alternative causes were also possible. Cases where relatedness cannot be assessed, or no information had been obtained were also classified as possible. 2. Probable -The relationship with use of device seemed relevant and/or event cannot reasonably be explained by another cause, but additional information may be obtained; 3. Causal relationship-The event was associated with device or with procedures beyond reasonable doubt with event occurred such as, a known side effect; temporal relationship; involves a body-site or organ that device was applied or had an effect on; followed a known response pattern; impact on event when discontinued and reintroduced; Others; Harms due to error in use.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With Adhesion Removal or Division Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score On the day of transection (Day 0) Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for adhesion removal or division by ENSEAL X1.
Number of Participants With Tissue Grasping Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score On the day of transection (Day 0) Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for tissue grasping by ENSEAL X1.
Percentage of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures Such as Sutures and Hemoclips On the day of transection (Day 0) Percentage of grade 4 vessel transections requiring hemostasis measures such as sutures and hemoclips were reported.
Number of Participants With Tissue Cutting Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score On the day of transection (Day 0) Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for tissue cutting by ENSEAL X1.
Number of Participants With Tissue Dissection Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score On the day of transection (Day 0) Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for tissue dissection by ENSEAL X1.
Number of Participants With Lymphatics Bundles Division Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score On the day of transection (Day 0) Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for lymphatics bundles division by ENSEAL X1.
Number of Participants With Tissue Bundles Division Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score On the day of transection (Day 0) Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for tissue bundles division by ENSEAL X1.
Number of Vessels With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Grading Scale On the day of transection (Day 0) A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with ENSEAL X1; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products). Here, the number of vessels that achieved Grade 1 to 4 hemostasis was reported.
Trial Locations
- Locations (6)
Methodist Hospital
🇺🇸Omaha, Nebraska, United States
National Cancer Center Hospital East
🇯🇵Chiba, Japan
Kitasato University
🇯🇵Kanagawa, Japan
Kanagawa Cancer Center
🇯🇵Yokohama, Japan
Zuyderland Medical Center
🇳🇱Sittard, Netherlands
Western General Hospital
🇬🇧Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Methodist Hospital🇺🇸Omaha, Nebraska, United States