跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02927782
NCT02927782Unknown不适用

Flat Bed Rest vs. Immediate Mobilisation After Incidental Durotomy During Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial

Balgrist University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2015年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Reoperation rate

研究概览

简要总结

Patients with persistent symptoms of cerebrospinal-fluid leakage (positional headache, photophobia, nausea and vomiting, clear drainage from the wound, fluctuant subcutaneous wound) after a primary repair should be considered for revision surgery to avoid potentially serious complications including CSF (cerebro spinal fluid) fistula formation. Prolonged bed rest immediatel after reapir of an ID () incidental durotomy) is widely accepted and frequently applied. current literature provides supporting retrospective evidence that prolonged bed rest may not be required after watertight closure of dural tears.

The purpose of this study is to further investigate the impact of prolonged bed rest on the need for early reoperation following primary repair of an ID after lumbar spinal surgery. The primary endpoint of this study is the difference in reoperation rate between the two study groups to further investigate if either one or the other postoperative mobilisation regimen provides a significant benefit in terms of persistent dural leakage.

详细描述

Patients with persistent symptoms of cerebrospinal-fluid leakage (positional headache, photophobia, nausea and vomiting, clear drainage from the wound, fluctuant subcutaneous wound) after a primary repair should be considered for revision surgery to avoid potentially serious complications including CSF (cerebro spinal fluid) fistula formation.

In a recent retrospective case series of 42 patients Radcliff et al. reported an increase in medical complications including pneumonia and wound infections associated with prolonged bed rest Current literature does not provide prospective nor retrospective evidence on the influence of early mobilization on complications or reoperation rate after ID (incidental durotomy).

Prolonged bed rest is widely accepted and frequently applied after ID. Contrarily, current literature provides supporting retrospective evidence that prolonged bed rest may not be required after watertight closure of dural tears.

The purpose of this study is to further investigate the impact of prolonged bed rest on the need for early reoperation following primary repair of an ID after lumbar spinal surgery. The primary endpoint of this study is the difference in reoperation rate between the two study groups to further investigate if either one or the other postoperative mobilisation regimen provides a significant benefit in terms of persistent dural leakage.

This study is designed as an unblinded, prospective randomised cohort trial. The treatment arms consist of either strict prolonged bed rest for 48 hours or immediate postoperative mobilisation. Patients are going to be randomised into either treatment arm after intraoperative verification of ID. Randomization into either treatment arm is going to be performed in a consecutive alternating manner. The according mobilisation regimen is going to be prescribed by the surgeon performing the index procedure immediately after wound closure as a standard option in the institutions proprietary hospital information system. Symptoms of persisting liquor leakage are going to be assessed by Investigator. Additional confirmation via MRI scan is routinely performed if persistent leakage is suspected and revision surgery is planned. For Patients with symptoms of persisting dural leakage after a 48 hours course of early mobilization a course of 24 hours of bed rest will be administered before revision surgery is scheduled.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 99 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patients over the age of 18 years with an ID sustained during a primary or revision lumbar spinal procedure at our institution are the subject of this prospective, randomised analysis.

排除标准

  • Patients referred for repair of an externally sustained ID, cases in which durotomy was not primarily recognised and repaired as well as patient who refuse to sign informed consent are going to be excluded from this analysis. Informed consent is going to be obtained one day prior to index procedure.
  • Further Intervention because of Spondylitis/Spondylodiscitis, Tumor, Trauma. Pregnant patients

结局指标

主要结局

Reoperation rate

时间窗: 6 weeks

The primary endpoint of this study is the difference in reoperation rate between the two study groups to further investigate if either one or the other postoperative mobilisation regimen provides a significant benefit in terms of persistent dural leakage.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Balgrist University Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mazda Farshad

MD MPH

Balgrist University Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验