MedPath

LAP-BAND AP Early Experience Trial (APEX)

Completed
Conditions
Obesity, Morbid
Interventions
Device: LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System
Registration Number
NCT00501085
Lead Sponsor
Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the LAP-BAND AP System in severely obese patients.

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study was to collect additional information about the safety and effectiveness of the LAP-BAND AP System in a real-life clinical setting. Effectiveness was assessed through the collection of weight loss data, as well as other secondary effectiveness measurements. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) related to treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
521
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient is scheduled to receive the LAP-BAND AP System
  • Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including: the Informed Consent Form (ICF), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) forms, follow-up schedule, completion of patient questionnaires.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Per the LAP-BAND AP System Directions For Use (DFU)

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
LAP-BANDLAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding SystemPatients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Percent Excess WeightBaseline to 5 Years

Subjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND ImplantationBaseline to 5 years

Subjects' Body Mass Index (BMI) was recorded at each follow-up visit for the 5 years after LAP-BAND implantation.

Subject Reported SatietyBaseline to 5 Years

Subjects rated their level of hunger, satiety after meals, and desire to eat at all follow-up visits. Level of hunger was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not hungry at all to 5 = as hungry as I have ever felt. Satiety after meals was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not at all full to 5 = as full as I have ever felt. Desire to eat was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = no desire at all to 5 = extremely strong desire.

Subject Reported Quality of LifeBaseline to 5 Years

Quality of Life was assessed using the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life Questionnaire (OWL-QOL-17). The OWL-QOL-17 is a survey of 17 questions, that rates quality of life on a scale of 0 (better) to 102 (lower).

Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)Baseline to 5 years

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire used to determine a subject's level of daytime sleepiness. Subjects rate his or her chances of dozing off in different situations, which are combined into a total ESS score that can vary between zero (low level of daytime sleepiness) and 24 (high level of daytime sleepiness).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Apollo Endosurgery

šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

Austin, Texas, United States

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath