Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
• Interventions: Procedure: 3d-Printing Myofunctional Appliance

• Registration Number: NCT04810286
• Lead Sponsor: T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Brief Summary

The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of Class II division 1 treatment in growing patients with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printing myofunctional appliance.

Detailed Description

This study aims to investigate the dentoskeletal effects of Class II division 1 treatment in growing patients with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printing myofunctional appliance.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2021-03
• Study First Submitted: 2021-03-17
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-03-19
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-03-19
• Study First Posted: 2021-03-22
• Last Update Posted: 2021-03-22
• Study Start: 2021-06-01
• Primary Completion: 2023-06-01
• Study Completion: 2023-11-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 120

Inclusion Criteria

• Increased overjet >4 mm
• Skeletal Class II relationship (ANB > 4 degree)
• No previous orthodontic treatment

Exclusion Criteria

-Craniofacial syndrome

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Experimental Group	3d-Printing Myofunctional Appliance	3D-print myofunctional appliance
Control Group	3d-Printing Myofunctional Appliance	Prefabricated myfunctional appliance

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Rate of dentoskeletal changes	1 year	Dentoskeletal effects of appliances

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ordu University; 🇹🇷 Ordu, Turkey