Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03140059
NCT03140059UnknownNot Applicable

Comparison Between Surgical Access and Repeated Applications of APDT to Residual Pockets Treatment in Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis: Randomized Clinical Trial

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho0 sites44 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
44
Primary Endpoint
Clinical attachment level

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study will be to compare the approach of repeated applications of APDT versus surgical therapy for the treatment of residual pockets in generalized agressive periodontitis.

Detailed Description

Scaling and root planing may be insufficient to resolve the periodontal infection resulting in residual periodontal pockets. A method of treatment to these sites would be the surgical therapy, because it allows access to root surfaces, making possible a better decontamination. However, the surgical approach may bring some negative points, as more discomfort and postoperative morbidity, increased transoperatory risk and increased risk of contamination. Thus, finding other alternatives to residual pockets treatment, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) was recently proposed. Therefore, the aim of this study will be to compare the approach of repeated applications of APDT versus surgical therapy for the treatment of residual pockets in generalized agressive periodontitis.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 35 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Diagnosis of generalized aggressive periodontitis (Armitage, 1999; American Academy of Periodontology, 2015);
  • •Have undergone a first approach for periodontal treatment (full-mouth ultrasonic debridement);
  • •Present at least one residual pocket of probing depth ≥ 5 mm and bleeding on probe not located in furcation region;
  • •Good general health;
  • •Agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form (TCLE) after explaining the risks and benefits;

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Systemic problems (cardiovascular alterations, blood dyscrasias, immunodeficiency - ASA III / IV / V) that contraindicate the periodontal procedure;
  • •Have used antibiotics and anti-inflammatories in the last six months;
  • •Smoke ≥ 10 cigarettes/day;
  • •Pregnant or lactating;
  • •Chronic use of medications that may alter the response of periodontal tissues;
  • •Indication of antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures;

Arms & Interventions

Open flap debridement

Active Comparator

In this group (n = 22), patients will receive open flap debridement will be performed to treat residual pockets.

Intervention: Open flap debridement (Procedure)

Repeated application of aPDT

Active Comparator

In this group (n=22), patients will receive 5 applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy after the scaling and root planing.

Intervention: Repeated application of aPDT (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical attachment level

Time Frame: 6 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Probing depth(6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mauro Pedrine Santamaria

DDS,MS,PhD

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Similar Trials

Comparison Between Surgical Access and... | Clinical Trial