跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02708615
NCT02708615已完成不适用

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gynecological Speculum Examination: Straight Horizontal Insertion vs. Vertical Insertion and Rotation

Unity Health Toronto2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 41 人开始时间: 2015年11月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
41
试验地点
2
主要终点
Pain/discomfort ratings of women receiving straight horizontal speculum insertion vs. those receiving vertical speculum insertion and rotation, as measured by a visual analog scale

研究概览

简要总结

This study compares two different types of speculum insertion to determine the level of discomfort they might cause. This study compares the straight horizontal insertion (SHI) of the speculum and the vertical insertion and rotation (VIR).

Participants are randomly assigned to one of the two insertion groups and are not told which group they are in until the examination is over. Participants rate their level of discomfort immediately after insertion of the speculum.

Basic demographic information (e.g., age, ethnicity, number of vaginal deliveries, menopausal status, etc.) and clinical information are also collected to determine if other factors influence the level of discomfort experienced.

*NOTE* This is NOT a paid study.

详细描述

In most medical schools around the world, speculum examination is taught using a bivalved speculum, since this is the type of speculum most commonly used in clinical practice. Due to the oval shape of the vulva, and the alignment of the labia majora and minora, the aperture of vaginal introitus is commonly perceived to have a vertical orientation. In reality however, the vaginal introitus is round and the vagina itself has more of a horizontal orientation: the anterior and posterior vaginal walls are opposed, and the sidewalls only become apparent once the anterior and posterior walls are separated. Nevertheless, the most common way of teaching the speculum examination worldwide is to introduce the speculum in a vertical orientation and then once it is successfully inserted into the vagina to rotate it 90° into a horizontal position. Once it is correctly positioned, it is slowly opened to visualize the vaginal epithelium and the cervix. However, in clinical practice, the rotation of the speculum in the vagina may cause pain and discomfort. Introduction of the speculum initially in a horizontal orientation, without rotation in the vagina, seems more appropriate and could potentially be associated with less discomfort or pain for women undergoing this exam. In practice, a minority of clinicians separate the labia first, introduce the speculum in a direct horizontal fashion, and thus avoid the potentially uncomfortable twisting part of the procedure.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Women who are 18 years of age or older
  • Undergoing a speculum examination as part of their regular clinical care
  • Proficient knowledge of the English language and able to sign the informed consent form

排除标准

  • Younger than 18 years of age
  • Women with a history of vulvodynia, vaginismus, or dyspareunia
  • No prior sexual activity or intercourse
  • Active vaginal, cervical, uterine or adnexal infection
  • Active pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum
  • Vulvar or vaginal surgery within three months
  • Psychiatric conditions

结局指标

主要结局

Pain/discomfort ratings of women receiving straight horizontal speculum insertion vs. those receiving vertical speculum insertion and rotation, as measured by a visual analog scale

时间窗: Measured immediately after speculum insertion

The primary objective of this study is to quantify the amount of pain/discomfort women experience with two different types of speculum insertion: straight horizontal insertion (SHI) and vertical insertion and rotation (VIR). Participants will rate their pain/discomfort by placing a mark on a visual analog scale measuring 10 cm in length. Pain/discomfort ratings on this scale range from "no pain" to "pain as bad as it possibly could be".

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验