Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement
- Conditions
- Periprosthetic Fractures
- Interventions
- Procedure: Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening
- Registration Number
- NCT02391129
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical (range of motion, weight bearing, quality of life) and radiographic outcome (boney consolidation) between open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plates with revision prosthesis using a non-cemented long femoral stem in a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip replacement.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 102
- Patients with Vancouver type- BlI, BIII and C fractures and unstable femoral prosthesis stem.
- Patients with pathological fractures,
- Vancouver type-A, Bl, and
- stable femoral prosthesis stem,
- Patients with hemi - prosthesis and periprosthetic femoral fractures were excluded from final analysis.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Helios Prosthesis Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening Patients treated with the first generation long-stem revision prosthesis Locking compression plate Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening Patients treated with LCP Hyperion Prosthesis Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening Patients treated with the second generation long-stem revision prosthesis
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip) follow up of at least 1 year Range of Motion of the hip
Radiographic Outcome (boney consolidation of the fracture) follow up of at least 1 year boney consolidation of the fracture after 3 month, 6 month and at least 1 year after the operation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient's Mobility (assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score) follow up of at least 1 year Patient's Mobility assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score