跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02391129
NCT02391129已完成不适用

Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement

Medical University of Vienna0 个研究点目标入组 102 人开始时间: 2014年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
102
主要终点
Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip)

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical (range of motion, weight bearing, quality of life) and radiographic outcome (boney consolidation) between open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plates with revision prosthesis using a non-cemented long femoral stem in a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip replacement.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with Vancouver type- BlI, BIII and C fractures and unstable femoral prosthesis stem.

排除标准

  • Patients with pathological fractures,
  • Vancouver type-A, Bl, and
  • stable femoral prosthesis stem,
  • Patients with hemi - prosthesis and periprosthetic femoral fractures were excluded from final analysis.

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip)

时间窗: follow up of at least 1 year

Range of Motion of the hip

Radiographic Outcome (boney consolidation of the fracture)

时间窗: follow up of at least 1 year

boney consolidation of the fracture after 3 month, 6 month and at least 1 year after the operation

次要结局

  • Patient's Mobility (assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score)(follow up of at least 1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Julian Joestl

MD

Medical University of Vienna

相似试验

Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision-... | 临床试验