Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 102
- 主要终点
- Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip)
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical (range of motion, weight bearing, quality of life) and radiographic outcome (boney consolidation) between open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plates with revision prosthesis using a non-cemented long femoral stem in a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip replacement.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with Vancouver type- BlI, BIII and C fractures and unstable femoral prosthesis stem.
排除标准
- •Patients with pathological fractures,
- •Vancouver type-A, Bl, and
- •stable femoral prosthesis stem,
- •Patients with hemi - prosthesis and periprosthetic femoral fractures were excluded from final analysis.
结局指标
主要结局
Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip)
时间窗: follow up of at least 1 year
Range of Motion of the hip
Radiographic Outcome (boney consolidation of the fracture)
时间窗: follow up of at least 1 year
boney consolidation of the fracture after 3 month, 6 month and at least 1 year after the operation
次要结局
- Patient's Mobility (assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score)(follow up of at least 1 year)
研究者
Julian Joestl
MD
Medical University of Vienna
