To compare two techniques (Triple airway manoeuvre Vs Reverse insertion) for I-gel placement in children under general anaesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: 2- Placement
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/01/061417
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical care Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Rohtak
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Paediatric patients (7-12 years), ASA 1 and 2 under general anaesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
Upper respiratory tract infection.
Increase risk of regurgitation.
Anticipated difficult airway.
Refusal to consent.
Emergency surgeries.
Surgeries planned under prone position.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare both the techniques in term of Mean insertion time.Timepoint: Insertion time will be calculated when the operator picks up the I-gel to the formation of square wave capnography on monitor.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Number of attempts <br/ ><br>2. Ease of insertion <br/ ><br>3. Ease of placement of nasogastric tube. <br/ ><br>4. Postoperative complications like presence or absence of blood, sore throat, hoarseness.Timepoint: 1. Till correct placement of I-gel with effective ventilation. <br/ ><br>2. Till end of I-gel placement. <br/ ><br>3. Till end of I-gel placement. <br/ ><br>4. Presence or absence of blood on I-gel will be assessed at the end of extubation on I-gel, sore throat and hoarseness shall be examined at 2hr, 4hr, 6hr after extubation. <br/ ><br>