Clinical Performance of Bioceramic vs High Viscosity GIC for Cervical Restorations of Geriatric Patients
- Conditions
- Cervical Caries
- Interventions
- Other: Resin modified glass ionomer restorationOther: Bioceramic glass ionomer restoration
- Registration Number
- NCT05624008
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate the performance of the bioceramic glass ionomer compared to conventional high viscosity glass ionomer for restoration of carious cervical lesions in geriatric patients over 12 months follow up.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- Geriatric patients aged above 55 years
- Patients with untreated carious lesions
- Patients who have at least 20 teeth under occlusion
- Patients with normal occlusion
- Vital teeth with carious cervical lesion with asymptomatic vital pulp.
- Teeth with no or minimum mobility.
- Teeth with normal occlusion.
- Teeth with surrounding healthy gingiva and supporting-structures.
- Patients who are unable to return for recall appointments
- Presence of abnormal oral, medical or mental conditions.
- Patients with severe medical diseases.
- Patients with xerostomia
- Patients with parafunctional habits.
- Non vital teeth.
- Teeth with signs or symptoms of pulpitis.
- Teeth with non carious lesions.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Resin modified glass ionomer restoration Resin modified glass ionomer restoration type II resin modified glass ionomer cement Bioceramic glass ionomer restoration Bioceramic glass ionomer restoration Calcium aluminate modified glass ionomer
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Marginal adaptation score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Color match score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Change in Wear score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Change in Retention score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Change in Marginal discoloration score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Change in Secondary caries score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Change in Postoperative hypersensitivity score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
🇪🇬Cairo, ElManial, Egypt