Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01799616
NCT01799616UnknownPhase 2

Efficiency and Safety Study of Pamidronate in Inflammatory Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disk Disease

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand1 site in 1 country48 target enrollmentStarted: January 2013Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Sponsor
Enrollment
48
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
back pain assessed on a100mm VAS

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether pamidronate is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of painful degenerative disk disease, also known as Modic type 1 changes

Detailed Description

Erosive degenerative disk disease, also known as Modic type 1 changes, is usually characterized by low back pain, with an inflammatory pain pattern, as seen in spondylarthropathies. Intravenous pamidronate has proven effective in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, and in painful bone diseases in general. We therefore hypothesized that pamidronate would be effective in treating back pain associated with Modic type 1 changes.

This study aimed to determine pamidronate's efficiency in reducing pain, with the primary outcome being a between-group difference of 30 points on a 100mm VAS at 3 months. Secondary outcomes are the improvement in functional status and the drug's tolerance. Primary and secondary outcome criteria will be assessed at each visit (inclusion, at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months). If the primary goal is not attained, a rigid or semi-rigid back brace will be proposed to the patient, regardless of the treatment group.

In total, 48 patients will need to be recruited. These patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, with each group comprising 24 patients: one group will be given pamidronate and the other placebo. Pamidronate will be administered at a dose of 90mg per day, 2 days in a row, and every patient, regardless of the treatment group, will be given paracetamol, in order to maintain blinding by preventing drug-induced fever.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • - Age from 18 to 60 years old
  • Low back pain
  • Daily pain since at least 3 months
  • VAS for pain > 40/100 during the last 48 hours
  • Inefficiency, intolerance, or contraindication to NSAIDS
  • Inefficiency of a rigid or half-rigid back brace
  • Modic 1 discopathy (diagnosed on MRI and confirmed by trained radiologist)
  • Dental check-up within the last 6 months
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • - Static disorders of the spine
  • Contraindication to pamidronate (hypocalcemia, severe kidney failure, or allergy)
  • Underage patients, patients under the protection of the law
  • Previous treatment with bisphosphonates
  • Pregnancy
  • Local or general infection
  • Previous discal surgery
  • Systemic corticosteroid therapy in the last month
  • Epidural or facet joint corticosteroid injection in the last month
  • History of septic spondylodiscitis
  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Low back pain associated with radiculalgia
  • Active psychiatric disorder
  • Inability to read or understand French
  • Body temperature above 38°C (fever) or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate above 20mm/hour

Arms & Interventions

Pamidronate

Experimental

In total, 48 patients will need to be recruited. These patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, with each group comprising 24 patients: one group will be given pamidronate and the other placebo

Intervention: Pamidronate (Drug)

Placebo

Other

In total, 48 patients will need to be recruited. These patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, with each group comprising 24 patients: one group will be given pamidronate and the other placebo

Intervention: Placebo (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

back pain assessed on a100mm VAS

Time Frame: at 3 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Tolerance based on the number and types of side-effects(at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months)
  • Back stiffness assessed by Schober's test and finger-to-floor distance(at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months)
  • Inflammatory pain pattern(at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months)
  • assess the efficacy of a rigid back brace in treating back pain(at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months)
  • - Functional status using EIFEL, Dallas, FABQ, MacTar, and MCII/PASS questionnaires(at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials