Comparative study of monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, gallbladder perforation rate, postoperative pain scores
研究概览
简要总结
This study is a prospective observational study evaluating the effectiveness and safety between surgeries performed using electrocautery and those performed using the curved jaw cordless ultrasonic dissector during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patient will be selected through consecutive sampling as they present for surgery and meet inclusion criteria. The choice of instrument will be based on availability and surgeon preference without any predefined allocation. The primary outcome measures include: operative time, intraoperative blood loss, gallbladder perforation rate, postoperative pain scores, postoperative complications. Data will be statistically analysed using appropriate tests, and the results will help determine whether the curved jaw cordless ultrasonic dissector offers significant clinical advantages over traditional electrocautery in terms of effectiveness, safety and patient outcomes.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Diagnosed with cholelithiasis admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.
排除标准
- •Acute or gangrenous cholecystitis, gallbladder malignancy, coagulopathies or bleeding disorders, patient with jaundice, use of instruments other than the intended dissector instruments, conversion to open surgery.
结局指标
主要结局
Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, gallbladder perforation rate, postoperative pain scores
时间窗: 2years
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
KSHETRIMAYUM ROMANCE SINGH
REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
