跳至主要内容
临床试验/KCT0006521
KCT0006521已完成未知

Comparison of clinical utilities between real-time ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-assisted thoracic epidural catheter placement: A randomized controlled study

Asan Medical Center0 个研究点目标入组 132 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
入组人数
132

研究概览

简要总结

We randomly assigned 132 patients to the allocated groups. The difference in the first pass success rate between the groups did not exceed the non-inferiority margin of 15% (ultrasound group: 66.7% vs.fluoroscopy group: 68.2%; difference -1.5%, 90% exact CI: -14.9 to 11.9). The difference in the final success rate also did not differ between the groups (98.5% vs. 100.0%; difference -1.5%, 90% exact CI: -4.0 to 1.0). The time to space marking (45.6 [34–62] vs. 59.0 [42–77] sec, p=0.004) and needling time (39.5 [28–78] vs. 112.5 [93–166] sec, p<0.001) were significantly shorter in the ultrasound group.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional Study

入排标准

年龄范围
20(Year) 至 79(Year)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1) Patients who undergo open thoracic or abdominal surgery
  • 2) Patients who is required thoracic epidural catheter placement
  • 3) 20 = age <80
  • 4) Patients who want to participate in this study and write informed consent voluntarily.

排除标准

  • 1) An allergy to local anesthetics and contrast dye
  • 2) Patients who are contraindicated in nerve block such as coagulopathy, antiplatelet therapy, infection
  • 3) Neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • 4) Pregnancy
  • 5) Patients who had surgery on the thoracic spine
  • 6) Patients who had thoracic compression fracture
  • 7) Patients who do not want to participate in this study

研究者

相似试验