Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01072019
NCT01072019CompletedNot Applicable

Comparative Clinical Study of the Vanguard® Knee System Using Signature™ Custom Guides & Conventional Techniques

Washington University School of Medicine1 site in 1 country25 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2010Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
25
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee replacement.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the surgical and clinical outcomes of patients receiving total knee replacement with the same implant using two different types of cutting guides during surgery:

  1. Standard knee cutting guides;
  2. MRI generated patient specific custom cutting guides.

Both types of cutting guides used in this study are registered with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are routinely used for knee replacement surgery. However, it is unknown if one type of cutting guide has risks or benefits over the other.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age 18 - 75
  • •Diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee and qualify for surgery, as indicated by one of the following:
  • •Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis where one or more compartments are involved;
  • •Correction of varus or valgus.
  • •Willing to participate and return for follow-up study visits.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Infection
  • •Osteomyelitis
  • •Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who is incapable of following directions
  • •Osteoporosis
  • •Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
  • •Osteomalacia
  • •Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
  • •Rapid joint destruction
  • •Marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram
  • •Vascular insufficiency
  • •Muscular atrophy
  • •Neuromuscular disease
  • •Incomplete or deficient soft tissue surrounding the knee
  • •Previous osteotomy
  • •Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
  • •Previous patella fracture or surgery
  • •Previous healed tibia or femur fractures
  • •Previous joint replacement surgery
  • •Cannot have an MRI
  • •Patients receiving single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Arms & Interventions

Standard knee cutting guides

Active Comparator

Standard cutting guides use traditional instrumentation to determine knee implant positions. During surgery, a rod is placed in the leg bone and the cutting guide is attached to that rod.

Intervention: Instrument (Other)

MRI generated patient specific custom cutting guides

Active Comparator

Patient specific cutting guides are custom-made for each patient based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Before surgery, MRI of the knee is done and used to create a cutting guide that is formed to the exact shape of the knee. The patient specific cutting guides have platforms that can be attached to the bone, so the rod does not need to be placed in the leg bone.

Intervention: Instrument (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee replacement.

Time Frame: Preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at four to six weeks, three months, six months, and one year postoperatively.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Postoperative recovery time following primary total knee replacement.(Immediate postoperative period (prior to discharge) and at four to six weeks, three months, six months, and one year postoperatively.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials