Comparing a Closing System Without a Needle With Positive Pressure to a Heparin Lock With Positive Pressure
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Neoplasms
- Registration Number
- NCT00386451
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Brief Summary
A prospective randomized study to compare 2 groups:
* heparine lock with positive pressure
* lock without a needle with positive pressure
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- Oncological patients who require intravenous chemotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical evaluation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms behind catheter occlusion in neoplasms patients using positive pressure systems?
How does needle-free positive pressure closure compare to heparin locks in reducing catheter-related complications for chemotherapy?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict catheter patency outcomes in cancer patients with different closure systems?
What are the long-term safety profiles of needle-free positive pressure systems versus heparin locks in oncology?
How do catheter maintenance strategies in NCT00386451 relate to current standards for central line management in hematologic malignancies?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospital Ghent
🇧🇪Ghent, Belgium
University Hospital Ghent🇧🇪Ghent, Belgium