Development and Evaluation of a PrEP Decision Aid for Women Seeking Domestic Violence Services in Baltimore
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- HIV
- Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Enrollment
- 53
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in Decisional preference for PrEP
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study is designed to develop and test an individual decision aid for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) tailored to Black women who have been exposed to intimate partner violence and are working with a domestic violence service provider. three different ways of delivering the tailored decision aid are being tested: 1) as an individual tool; or 2) as a shared decision-making tool with a domestic violence advocate; as compared to generalized information. The goal of decision aid will be to address key cultural and structural factors affecting these women and can help them gain PrEP awareness and access.
Detailed Description
Intimate partner violence (IPV)-exposed Black women are often forced to choose between relationship safety and HIV prevention; thus, trauma-, gender-, culturally-responsive HIV prevention interventions are needed for this key priority population. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may be a viable partner-independent option for IPV-exposed Black women, but no study has identified an evidence-based strategy to promote and increase PrEP uptake among this population, specifically IPV-exposed Black women in the South. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the proposed research aims to adapt, implement and evaluate self- and advocate-administered versions of a PrEP decision aid in a domestic violence agency in Baltimore in order to increase PrEP uptake among Black women in Ending the HIV Epidemic (EtHE) priority areas, address trauma as a barrier to PrEP uptake, and ultimately combat racial disparities in women's HIV cases. Therefore, this Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study seeks to adapt an existing PrEP decision aid to IPV-exposed Black women seeking domestic violence (DV) services in Baltimore, an EtHE priority state. Self- and advocate-administered versions of the PrEP decision aid will be implemented and the aid will be evaluated using a three-arm randomized trial. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will guide this research. A formative evaluation using qualitative interviews with IPV-exposed Black women (N=10) and DV advocates (N=20) was conducted to adapt the PrEP decision aid. Next, the decision aid will be implemented in a DV agency and 90 IPV-exposed Black women will be randomized to either the self- or advocate-administered versions of the aid, or the control intervention, in order to compare feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness with baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month surveys. Focus groups with DV advocates and participants will assess for implementation process outcomes. This study will: provide support for a PrEP decision aid that addresses HIV prevention for IPV-exposed Black women; use implementation science to increase PrEP uptake; include DV agencies in intervention development and implementation; and improve understanding of PrEP scale-up by addressing implementation factors in settings that serve IPV-exposed Black women.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •age 18 years or older
- •self-identification as cisgender female
- •IPV-exposed (i.e., at least one physical, sexual, or psychological IPV victimization experience by a male partner) in the past 12 months
- •self-reported HIV negative
- •English- and/or Spanish-speaking
- •self-identify as Black or African American
Exclusion Criteria
- •Currently using PrEP
- •Unable to provide consent
- •Participated in formative research for this study
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in Decisional preference for PrEP
Time Frame: Baseline and post intervention, up to 2 minutes
Single item screening question: "How interested are you in starting PrEP now?" repeated at the beginning and end of engagement with the decision aid, with responses measured on a 5- point Likert scale, with responders specify their level of agreement to the question in five points: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree.
Change in HIV Risk Perception
Time Frame: Baseline and post intervention, up to 2 minutes
8-item Perceived Risk of HIV scale repeated at the beginning and end of engagement with the decision aid, with responses measured on a 5- point Likert scale, which has been shown to be more robust than a single-item screening question for HIV risk perception. Specifically, responders will specify their level of agreement to the question in five points: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in PrEP Uptake(Month 1, Month 3, Month 6)