Assessing the Effectiveness of a Holistic Semi-tailormade Well-being Intervention at Work: Study Protocol of a Partially Randomized Preference Trial Design
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 2,000
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Commitment
研究概览
简要总结
Organizations are becoming increasingly aware that employees are an important factor in gaining and maintaining competitive advantage. Based on the current evidence, a holistic approach, in which different well-being factors and different levels are addressed simultaneously, is needed. However, given the scarcity of this approach in studies, a significant gap in knowledge is demonstrated. This paper tries to address these shortcomings. A partially randomised preference trials design is used to evaluate the impact of an intervention package that focusses on both the individual and organizational level and addresses 3 different domains to improve well-being: psychosocial, ergonomic and lifestyle. The data collection of the research outcomes will be conducted at several points in time. Therefore, a online self-administered questionnaire is developed en will be administered before the start of the intervention. Six and twelve months after the intervention, the short and long term impact of the intervention will be measured. The intervention itself consists of a basic intervention package that will be spread over 3 different days that take place over a time period of maximum 2 weeks. Between 20 and 30 companies will be recruited from a data pool with clients from the Flemish side of Belgium. The sample size of the participating employees should be at least 2000. A stratified random sampling method will be used based on sector type while company size (small-medium-large) will be taken into account
详细描述
Background
Since there's a high prevalence of people with work-related mental health problems and chronic diseases, the literature used to mainly focus on the negative impact on the well-being of individuals and the consequences for the organizations and how to prevent this.
The last decades, developing methods for preventing health problems has been recognized as crucial and should be high on the agenda of workplace health promotion programs. The introduction of a positive psychology approach to well-being highlights not only the prevention of health problems but especially creating a healthy organization with an environment that can promote employee health and safety as well as organizational effectiveness by enhancing individual and organizational resources .
Organizations are becoming increasingly aware that employees are an important factor in gaining and maintaining competitive advantage . Therefore, literature has seen a growth on research on constructs such as engagement or flow, thriving at work, flourishing at work, meaning at work, and purpose in life or personal growth. Engagement has become one of the most significant concepts in the management field in recent years. It yields positive outcomes such as high levels of well-being and performance . Individuals who are engaged in their work have higher levels of energy, are enthusiastic about their work, and are completely immersed in their work activities. Furthermore, well-being at work is not only crucial for the well-being of the individual employee but it also has positive consequences for the organization, such as better work performance, higher levels of employee creativity and engagement. It has also been associated with lower rates of absenteeism at work.
With most adults spending around half of their waking hours at work, the workplace is an important setting to promote health and well-being. Multiple studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes have shown that workplace interventions may result in positive effects. Therefore, it is very important to address and enhance determinants of workplace-related well-being. Interventions that enhance well-being can take place on both the individual level and the organizational level. On the individual level, well-being and health can be improved by different intervention domains. Firstly, physical activity can improve a healthy lifestyle and well-being. Secondly, psychosocial interventions, such as engagement interventions, resilience training or burnout preventions increase mental health and well-being. Lastly, ergonomic interventions, such as sitting behavior has an impact on health . For employees who attended well-being interventions, the number of absence days due to stress, anxiety and depression had fallen over the following three years. In addition, they reported improvements in their relationships, improvements in sleep patterns and improvements in happiness when at work. On the organizational level, workplace well-being programs are expected to reduce employee healthcare costs, increase productivity, and provide a positive return on investment. However, today, empirical evidence for organizational interventions remains limited and the effectiveness of organizational level workplace interventions has not been fully examined. Furthermore, only a small number of studies have thus far examined organizational interventions or activities as potential antecedents of engagement.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Factorial
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Sufficient knowledge in one of the languages (Dutch, French, English)
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Holistic semi-tailormade well-being (intervention) group
They receive the holistic semi-tailormade intervention, consisting of training and workshops in three well-being domains: psychosocial, ergonomic and lifestyle. In addition to this intervention, they still receive their standard interventions
干预措施: Holistic semi-tailormade well-being intervention (Behavioral)
Standard well-being (control) group
At first, they receive standard well-being interventions. After six or twelve months, this group can participate in the holistic semi-tailormade well-being intervention.
结局指标
主要结局
Commitment
时间窗: Change from baseline to post-interventional measurement at 6 and 12 months
Change in self-reported COPSOQ subscale 'Commitment' (5 items) from baseline measurement to follow-up measurements at 6 and 12 months
Engagement
时间窗: Change from baseline to post-interventional measurement at 6 and 12 months
Change in self-reported Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (9 items) from baseline measurement to follow-up measurements at 6 and 12 months
Jobsatisfaction
时间窗: Change from baseline to post-interventional measurement at 6 and 12 months
Change in self-reported Jobsatisfaction (1 item) from baseline measurement to follow-up measurements at 6 and 12 months
次要结局
- Life satisfaction(Change from baseline to post-interventional measurement at 6 and 12 months)
- Basic needs(Change from baseline to post-interventional measurement at 6 and 12 months)
- Affect(Change from baseline to post-interventional measurement at 6 and 12 months)
- Burnout(Change from baseline to post-interventional measurement at 6 and 12 months)
