跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04087668
NCT04087668已完成不适用

Deep Sedation and General Anesthesia for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 405 人开始时间: 2019年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
405
试验地点
1
主要终点
The overall complication rate

研究概览

简要总结

Providing the appropriate anesthetic technique for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in remote locations can be challenging. The aim of this study was therefore to prospectively assess and compare the feasibility of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with propofol based deep sedation, standard general anesthesia and general anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing ERCP.

详细描述

ERCP is identified as one of the most invasive endoscopic procedures, during which patients may experience anxiety, discomfort and suffer different degree of pain. So, anesthesia and analgesia are essential for this invasive procedure, especially therapeutic ERCPs. Thus, we compared the efficacy of using monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with deep sedation versus general anesthesia (GA) to perform this procedure and the incidence of complications associated with these methods of anesthesia.

Previous studies have concluded that intubation is possible without the use of neuromuscular blockade. We assume that the use of propofol and adjuvants short-acting opioids may provide adequate conditions for tracheal intubation. It was also hypothesized that it may also be useful in facilitating ERCP under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Aged 18-70 years old
  • Grade Ⅰ and Ⅲ according to physical status classification system of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
  • Coagulation function tests in normal range

排除标准

  • Potentially difficult airways
  • Administration of sedative or narcotic drugs in the previous 24 hours
  • Severe renal or hepatic impairment
  • Severe cardiopulmonary comorbidities (defined as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV or greater)
  • Contraindications to a nasotracheal intubation
  • Coagulopathy
  • History of frequent episodes of epistaxis
  • Emergent ERCP
  • At risk for reflux and aspiration

结局指标

主要结局

The overall complication rate

时间窗: within 72 hours of ERCP

The primary outcome was the overall pulmonary and cardiac complication rate.

次要结局

  • Premature termination rate of ERCP(During the procedure)
  • Anesthesia time(During the procedure)
  • Procedural failure rate of ERCP(During the procedure)
  • Conversion to GA(During the procedure)
  • Temporary interruption rate of ERCP(During the procedure)
  • Procedure time(During the procedure)
  • Delayed Adverse Events(within 72 hours of ERCP)
  • Room time(During the procedure)
  • Immediate Adverse Events(within 24 hours of ERCP)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Different Anesthetic Technique For ERCP | 临床试验