CORCYM Mitral, Aortic aNd Tricuspid Post-maRket Study in a reAl-world Setting
- Conditions
- Cardiac Valve Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT05002543
- Lead Sponsor
- Corcym S.r.l
- Brief Summary
MANTRA is a prospective, multiple-arm, multi-center, global, post-market clinical follow-up study. The main objective is to monitor ongoing safety and performance of the CORCYM devices and accessories used for aortic, mitral and tricuspid valvular diseases in a real-world setting.
Corcym S.r.l., is a medical device manufacturer with a broad product portfolio for cardiac surgeons, offering solutions for the treatment of aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve disease.
The MANTRA Master Plan (Master Protocol) is intended as an overarching Umbrella Protocol that allows multiple sub-studies to be added, as needed. The Umbrella Master Protocol concept offers an excellent solution to provide post-marketing clinical follow-up information on the entire cardiac surgery heart valve portfolio of the sponsor in a common database, including corelab assessment of hemodynamic and structural performance, annular motion and Dynamics for one of the products.
Currently, three sub-studies are planned:
* MANTRA - Aortic Sub-Study
* MANTRA - Mitral/Tricuspid Sub-Study (Excluding Memo 4D)
* MANTRA - Memo 4D Sub-Study
- Detailed Description
The MANTRA Master Plan (Master Protocol) is intended as an overarching Umbrella Protocol that allows multiple substudies to be added, as needed. The Umbrella Master Protocol concept offers an excellent solution to provide post-marketing clinical follow-up information on the entire cardiac surgery heart valve portfolio of the sponsor in a common database.
Currently, three substudies are planned:
* MANTRA - Aortic Sub-Study
* MANTRA - Mitral/Tricuspid Sub-Study (excluding Memo 4D)
* MANTRA - Memo 4D Sub-Study
The aim of the studies assembled under the master protocol is the continued collection of safety and performance data during heart valve procedures and the relevant follow-up visits in subjects where any of the CORCYM devices and accessories are used in a real-world setting, in accordance with the IFUs, and at the discretion of the investigator.
MANTRA study is expected to enroll approximately 2150 subjects in up to 130 sites worldwide:
* Approximately 1650 subjects considered suitable for treatment with a CORCYM aortic device
* Approximately 300 subjects considered suitable for treatment with a CORCYM mitral and/or tricuspid device (excluding Memo 4D)
* Approximately 200 subjects considered suitable for treatment with Memo 4D
Expected enrollment duration may vary across the different projects. Subject follow-up is planned at discharge, 30 days after implantation and then annually up to 10 years. Sites can choose to participate in one or more sub-studies.
All available data shall be gathered during standard medical care.
At a minimum, the following data will be collected:
* Informed Consent
* Screening/Baseline data, including demographics and medical history
* Procedural data
* Hospitalization and Discharge data
* Follow-up data: 30 days and annually up to 10 years post procedure
* Serious Adverse Event and Device Deficiencies information
As part of the study, the subject will be asked to complete quality of life questionnaire(s) at baseline, 30 days and at 1-year follow-up.
In addition, for the MEMO 4D sub-study only, an Echocardiography Core Laboratory has been appointed by the Sponsor to assess the hemodynamic and structural performance, annular motion and dynamics, and 3D echocardiogram images (transesophageal during the procedure and transthoracic during follow up) will be collected for Corelab readings.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2150
- Signed and dated approved Informed Consent
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow up schedule of the protocol
- Eligible for treatment with CORCYM aortic, mitral and/or tricuspid products as outlined in the applicable Instructions for Use (IFU)
- Subject is already participating to another clinical investigation that could confound the results of this clinical investigation.
- Subject has a life expectancy ≤ 12 months
- Subject has contraindications to the use of CORCYM aortic, mitral and/or tricuspid devices as outlined in the applicable Instructions For Use (IFU)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary endpoint in the AORTIC Sub-study is number and percentage of subjects with Device Success 30 days Device success at 30 days (+14 days) based on VARC-3, defined as:
* Technical success
* Freedom from mortality
* Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication
* Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient\<20 mmHg and less than moderate aortic regurgitation)
The number and percentage of subjects with device success at 30 days as per VARC-3 definition, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.The primary endpoint in the MITRAL/TRICUSPID Sub-study is number and percentage of subjects with Device Success 30 days Device success at 30 days (+14 days) based on MVARC, defined as:
* Procedural mortality or stroke AND
* Proper placement and positioning of the device AND
* Freedom from unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device or access procedure AND
* Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including:
* Evidence of structural or functional failure
* Specific device-related technical failure issues and complications
* MITRAL: Reduction of Mitral Regurgitation (MR) to either optimal or acceptable levels (site-reported)
* TRICUSPID: Reduction of Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) to either optimal or acceptable levels (site-reported)
Number and percentage of subjects with device success, along with individual component, will be presented.The primary endpoint in the MEMO 4D Sub-study is number and percentage of subjects with Device Success 30 days Device success at 30 days (+14 days) based on the MVARC, defined as:
* Procedural mortality or stroke; AND
* Proper placement and positioning of the device; AND
* Freedom from unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device or access procedure; AND
* Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including:
* Evidence of structural or functional failure
* Specific device-related technical failure issues and complications
* Reduction of Mitral Regurgitation (MR) to either optimal or acceptable levels without significant mitral stenosis (i.e., post-procedure EOA is ≥ 1.5 cm2 with a transmitral gradient \<5 mmHg), and with no greater than mild MR core-lab assessed
The number and percentage of subjects with device success at 30 days as per MVARC definition, along with individual component of the success, will be presented.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Technical success intraoperatively Technical success, defined as successful delivery, correct positioning and deployment of the first intended device intraoperatively
Valve-related long-term clinical efficacy at 5 years and up to 10 years Valve-related long-term clinical according to VARC-3 guidelines
Clinical Efficacy (AORTIC sub-study) 12 months Clinical Efficacy according to VARC-3 guidelines
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE - composite endpoint of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and valve re-intervention) up to 10 years from implant Number of patients with this event
Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction (BVD), including Structural Valve Deterioration (SVD), Non structural valve dysfunction (NSVD), Thrombosis and Endocarditis up to 10 years from implant Number of patients with this event
Patient outcome (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification) up to 10 years from implant Change of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from baseline up to 12 months after implant, and at each subsequent follow-up
Mortality (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, device related mortality) up to 10 years from implant Number of patients with this event
Re-hospitalization (all-cause re-hospitalization, cardiovascular re-hospitalization, device related re-hospitalization) up to 10 years from implant Number of patients with this event
Hemodynamic and structural performance up to 10 years from implant Main hemodynamic parameters will be collected according to the different indications (Aortic, Mitral and Tricuspid)
Patient outcome (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12); and EQ-5D-5L (in patients treated with Perceval Plus) 12 months Quality of life improvement from baseline up to 12 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (52)
Cleveland Clinic
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Innsbruck Medical University
🇦🇹Innsbruck, Austria
Hospital de Santa Maria Lisbon
🇵🇹Lisboa, Portugal
Stadtspital Triemli
🇨🇭Zürich, Switzerland
UZ Leuven
🇧🇪Leuven, Belgium
Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute
🇷🇸Belgrade, Serbia
East Carolina University
🇺🇸Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg
🇧🇪Genk, Belgium
St. Michael's Hospital
🇨🇦Toronto, Canada
Maine Medical Center
🇺🇸Portland, Maine, United States
St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
🇺🇸New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Duke University
🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Pennsylvania
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
🇺🇸Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
UZ Gent
🇧🇪Gent, Belgium
University of Calgary (Foothills Hospital)
🇨🇦Calgary, Canada
CHU Clermont-Ferrand_Hopital Gabriel Montpied
🇫🇷Clermont-Ferrand, France
Centre Hospitalier de Lens
🇫🇷Lens, France
CHU Poitiers
🇫🇷Poitiers, France
Universitätsklinikum Augsburg
🇩🇪Augsburg, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Kerckhoff Klinik
🇩🇪Bad Nauheim, Germany
CHU Toulouse_Rangueil University Hospital
🇫🇷Toulouse, France
Herzzentrum Dresden Universitätsklinik
🇩🇪Dresden, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
🇩🇪Magdeburg, Germany
Klinikum Oldenburg GGMBH AöR
🇩🇪Oldenburg, Germany
Klinikum Nürnberg
🇩🇪Nürnberg, Germany
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi
🇮🇹Bologna, Italy
Ospedale Riuniti Ancona
🇮🇹Ancona, Italy
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero
🇮🇹Brescia, Italy
Ospedale Città di Lecce
🇮🇹Lecce, Italy
Ospedale del Cuore "G. Pasquinucci"
🇮🇹Massa, Italy
Azienda ospedaliera dei Colli - Ospedale Monaldi
🇮🇹Napoli, Italy
Policlinico Paolo Giaccone
🇮🇹Palermo, Italy
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
🇮🇹Milan, Italy
A.O.U. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Ospedale Molinette
🇮🇹Torino, Italy
Ospedale Cà Foncello di Treviso
🇮🇹Treviso, Italy
Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti" di Trieste
🇮🇹Trieste, Italy
Ospedale San Bortolo
🇮🇹Vicenza, Italy
Seoul National University Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
UMC Groningen
🇳🇱Groningen, Netherlands
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
🇰🇷Yangsan, Korea, Republic of
Catharina Ziekenhuis
🇳🇱Eindhoven, Netherlands
Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern
🇨🇭Bern, Switzerland
Queen Elisabeth Medical Centre
🇬🇧Birmingham, United Kingdom
Bristol Royal Infirmary
🇬🇧Bristol, United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Hospital Laval IUCPQ
🇨🇦Québec, Canada
Universitätsklinikum Essen
🇩🇪Essen, Germany
Yonsei University Severance Cardiovascular Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of