A comparison of clinical efficiency of nanocomposite and conventional composite used for bonding lower fixed retainers.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/11/038102
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Shravanthi M
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Adult patients visiting the department for orthodontic treatment, and have undergone debonding and indicated for fixed retention in the mandibular arch.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with chronic periodontal diseases
Missing mandibular anterior teeth
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate survival rate of mandibular fixed lingual retainersTimepoint: at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month of retention period
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate periodontal health status of mandibular fixed lingual retainersTimepoint: at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month of retention period