Enhancing Cancer Prevention and Control Pathways-Native Health Initiative

There are continued disparities in cancer incidence, mortality, and survival between American Indians (AIs) and Whites on cancers responsive to early screening (i.e., breast, colorectal, and cervical) in the US. Between 1990-2009, based on data from Contract Health Service Delivery Area Counties across the US, the mortality-to-incidence ratios for these cancers were significantly higher for American Indian/Alaska Natives compared to Whites (breast: 1.22, colorectal: 1.16, cervix: 1.36), indicating poorer survival. New Mexico (NM) AIs also experience substantial cancer disparities. Between 2010-2014, AIs compared to Whites had higher incidence (per 100,000) for cervical (7.9 vs. 6.9) and colorectal (male: 46.5 vs. 35.2; female: 29.2 vs. 28.2) cancers, and higher mortality for cervical (3.7 vs. 1.3) and colorectal (males only; 18.9 vs. 15.6) cancers. AIs were more likely to receive a late-stage (i.e., regional or distant) cancer diagnosis for all 3 screen detectable cancers. AIs have some of the lowest cancer screening rates compared with other racial/ethnic groups. In NM, AIs listed in the Indian Health Service (IHS) Albuquerque Area have substantially lower screening rates than the state's White population do. AIs had screening rates of: breast (58.5%, women ages 52-64), colorectal (41.9%, ages 50-75), and cervical (63.9%, women ages 24-64) cancers; whereas, screening rates for Whites were: breast (70.0%, ages 50-74), colorectal (69.2%, ages 50-75), and cervical (77.8%, women 21-65)

The overall objective is to develop and pilot test culturally and linguistically appropriate interventions to enhance age- and risk-appropriate breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening in concordance with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended guidelines

Aim 3 (Focus Groups, Descriptive): Qualitative documentation of perspectives on cancer control needs in the Zuni Pueblo

Protocol: Aim 3 (Focus Groups, Descriptive): Qualitative documentation of perspectives on cancer control needs in the Zuni Pueblo

1. Research Design: Focus groups that gather qualitative (descriptive) perspectives and insights from a small group of participants
2. Research Setting: Zuni Pueblo
3. Participant identification and sampling: Non-probability sampling
4. Procedures: The investigators will contact interested participants for focus group sessions
5. Primary Outcome: Knowledge about, barriers and support for, and communication about breast, cervix, and colorectal cancers
6. Data Analysis: Thematic analyses of transcripts of the focus group discussions
7. Sample Size Considerations: The investigators will enroll about 8-10 participants per focus group