跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/09/095204
CTRI/2025/09/095204尚未招募不适用

Comparing the efficacy of using a Passive drain versus Clamped drain in reducing postoperative complications following Decompressive Craniectomy in traumatic brain injury patients - A Randomised Controlled Trial

Dr Shashikant Prasad1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 94 人开始时间: 2025年10月6日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
94
试验地点
1
主要终点
To know the advantages and complications(Subgaleal haematoma, Meningitis, Hydrocephalus, Brain Bulge, Fever ,Surgical site infection, Hematoma and need for reoperation) of usage of Drain versus Clamped drain in DC for traumatic brain injury.

研究概览

简要总结

This randomized controlled trial titled “Comparing the efficacy of Passive drain versus Clamped drain in reducing postoperative complications following Decompressive Craniectomy in traumatic brain injury patients” will be conducted at AIIMS Patna to address the ongoing controversy regarding routine drain use after decompressive craniectomy (DC). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and although DC is effective in controlling raised intracranial pressure, postoperative complications such as subgaleal hematoma, surgical site infection, hydrocephalus, and need for reoperation remain frequent. While passive drains are traditionally used, they may increase risks without improving functional outcomes, and no clear guidelines exist regarding their use or clamping. The study will enroll 94 adult patients (18–65 years) with isolated TBI requiring DC, randomized equally into two groups: passive drain versus clamped drain. Block randomization with sealed envelopes will ensure allocation concealment. Standardized DC will be performed in all cases, with drains removed on the second postoperative day if imaging is satisfactory; in the clamped group, drains will remain closed unless neurological deterioration occurs. Outcomes assessed will include postoperative complications, mortality, and 3-month neurological status using the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended. Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical tests with p < 0.05 considered significant. We expect that clamped drains will be as safe as passive drains while minimizing infection and hydrocephalus risk, thereby contributing evidence to inform clinical practice, optimize outcomes, and guide future recommendations.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • All patients of Isolated TBI requiring DC between the ages of 18-65 years.
  • Legally authorized representative of patient giving consent for surgery.

排除标准

  • Patients with coagulopathy (International normalized ratio more than 1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets less than 100 x 103 / µL) ,or recent antiplatelet or anticoagulation’s used in the past 7 days.
  • Patients with trivial fall diagnosed to be intracerebral haemorrhage secondary to hypertension.
  • Patients with polytrauma.

结局指标

主要结局

To know the advantages and complications(Subgaleal haematoma, Meningitis, Hydrocephalus, Brain Bulge, Fever ,Surgical site infection, Hematoma and need for reoperation) of usage of Drain versus Clamped drain in DC for traumatic brain injury.

时间窗: Day1 day2 Day3 7th day 1month 3month

次要结局

  • To know the feasibility and possible adversities in using drain in comparison to clamped drain in DC for management of traumatic brain injury .(18 MONTHS)

研究者

发起方
Dr Shashikant Prasad
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Shashikant Prasad

All India Institute of Medical Science Patna

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验