KCT0008324
Completed
未知
Comparative clinical study of efficacy and safety between GESELLELIGNE and Juvederm Voluma for restoration of mid-face volume deficit; A multi-center, randomized, single-blinded, investigator initiated trial
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Pusan National University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 100
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\) Men and women between the ages of 30 and 65
- •2\) Those who need correction of mid\-face volume deficit scale (MFVDS) grade 2 or higher facial volume
- •3\) Those whose face volume is bilaterally symmetrical
- •4\) Those who agreed not to undergo other facial correction procedures during the clinical trial period
- •5\) A person who is willing to participate in a clinical trial, comply with treatment and procedures, and visit a hospital for all observation evaluations
- •6\) A person who voluntarily signed a written consent after hearing the explanation about the purpose and method of this clinical trial
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\) Those who have taken anticoagulants within 2 weeks before participating in the clinical trial (however, low\-dose (300 mg/day or less) aspirin administration is allowed.)
- •2\) Those who have applied calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) to the target area of this study within 1 year before participating in the clinical trial
- •3\) Those who administer immunosuppressants
- •4\) Those who have undergone permanent filler treatment or fat grafting in the area subject to this study
- •5\) Those who have undergone wrinkle correction procedures (e.g., botulinum toxin A injection, face lift, soft tissue augmentation, middle skin peel, dermal photorejuvenation, etc.) within 6 months prior to participation in the clinical trial
- •6\) Those with a history of hypersensitivity to lidocaine or hyaluronic acid
- •7\) Those with a history of keloid formation or hypertrophic scars on the face
- •8\) Those with a history of streptococcal infectious disease on the face
- •9\) Subjects with wounds, scars, skin disorders or infections around the area subject to this study that may affect efficacy evaluation
- •10\) If those are pregnant or lactating, or if those are a woman of childbearing age, those do not agree to maintain contraception during the clinical trial period (\*Medically accepted contraception methods: use condoms, oral contraception continued for at least 3 months, or injection or insertion contraceptives) If those do, if those have an intrauterine contraceptive device installed, etc.)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
A study to compare efficacy and safety of topical alcaftadine versus topical olopatadine in patients with allergic conjunctivitsHealth Condition 1: H109- Unspecified conjunctivitisCTRI/2024/03/064161eeraj Rajdan
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine in caudal block in paediatric patients posted for infra umbilical surgeries.Health Condition 1: N399- Disorder of urinary system, unspecifiedCTRI/2024/01/061191Acharya Vinobha Bhave Rural Hospital
Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparative study of efficacy, safety and patient compliance of Dapagliflozin(anti diabetic drug) and Metformin(anti diabetic drug) Vs Vildagliptin(anti diabetic drug) and Metformin combination therapy in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes patientsCTRI/2020/12/030147Kumar Gautam
Completed
Not Applicable
Effect of 10% Potassium hydroxide and 50% Trichloroacetic acid on plane wartsIRCT20170829035976N2Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences64
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of adhesive and suture in skin closure following small incision abdominal surgery(laparoscopic)CTRI/2024/07/070591Adichunchanagiri Institute Of Medical Sciences