Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Genomics & Science DOJO 3.0 Learning Method in Improving Research Skills and Scientific Writing Among Researchers in Indonesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 96
- Locations
- 2
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of the DOJO 3.0 learning methodology in enhancing research skills and scientific writing among researchers in Indonesia compared to non-DOJO learning method. The main questions it aims to answer are:
How effective is the Dojo 3.0 methodology in improving participants' research skills and scientific writing, including critical thinking, data analysis ability, knowledge acquisition, and scientific manuscript quality and publication progress? How do participants' experiences, perceptions of the learning process and teaching quality, as well as their engagement, performance, and learning behaviors, differ between the intervention (DOJO) and control groups throughout the program?
Researchers will compare two groups, control group and intervention group to see if there is a significant difference between these two groups.
Standard learning method Non-DOJO (Control) DOJO learning method (Intervention)
For the intervention group, participants will participate in Shinjitsu class, an interactive dynamic lecture with real time engagement, an offline minicamp session with lecture that is more intense, intentionally more provocative and dynamic, wounded healer, shinjitsu ninja obstacles, shinjitsu ninja run, sparring and Tournament.
Detailed Description
Detailed Description
This study is using a randomised controlled trial method conducted in Jakarta, Indonesia, designed to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of the DOJO 3.0 learning methodology in enhancing research skills and scientific writing among researchers in Indonesia compared to non-DOJO learning methods.
This study consists of a cluster randomized trial with two intervention arms, to evaluate the effectiveness of the genomics and science DOJO 3.0 learning method, specifically comparing between standard learning method and DOJO learning method. The DOJO learning method will be delivered through structured components, including modularized minicamps, structured mentoring, expanded Shinjitsu tournaments, and the introduction of the Shinjitsu Ninja component, providing a platform for scientific capacity building, collaboration, and innovation.
To support implementation across both study components, several structured operational procedures will be applied. To minimize contamination between groups,activities for the control and intervention arms will be conducted in separate locations. However, to ensure consistency in content delivery, both groups will receive the same core instructional materials and be taught by the same instructors (Sensei). The primary distinction between groups will lie in the learning approach and environment, with the intervention group receiving the DOJO learning method and the control group receiving a standard (non-DOJO) learning method.
- Sample Size and Statistical Considerations The sample size calculation is based on the expected effect size of the intervention on primary outcomes (critical thinking, knowledge improvement, data analysis, personal empowerment, manuscript quality and quality of teaching), anticipated attrition among participants, and statistical power considerations to ensure meaningful results. Taking these factors into account, it is estimated that approximately 48 teams or 96 individuals will be recruited and participating in this study.
- Quality Assurance and Data Management A comprehensive quality assurance framework will be implemented to ensure data integrity, accuracy, and consistency across all study sites. Electronic data capture systems will incorporate built-in validation rules, including range checks, consistency checks, and logical constraints across related variables.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Other
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Registered participants of Genomics & Science DOJO 3.0
- •Teams consisting of two members
- •Submission of research concept note
- •Completion of screening and assessment stages (administratively and substantially through blind concept note screening and team's curriculum vitae)
- •Willingness and commitment to participate in the full program will be ensured through a structured confirmation process.
- •In addition, participants will be required to review, sign, and submit a commitment letter outlining the full schedule, expectations for attendance, and participation requirements.
- •Information regarding program schedule and participation expectations will be communicated at multiple stages, including during registration, program launch, and post-selection, to ensure participants are fully informed prior to confirming their participation.
- •Involvement/ attendance of the first author
Exclusion Criteria
- •Incomplete registration or documentation
- •Failure to meet team composition requirements
- •Withdrawal before intervention
- •Incomplete baseline data
Arms & Interventions
Standard Learning Method
Participants receive:
Standard learning method Regular teaching style and digital material
Intervention: Standard Learning Methodology (Behavioral)
Genomics & Science Learning Methodology
Participants receive:
DOJO 3.0 Learning Method Regular teaching style and digital material
Intervention: Genomics & Science Dojo Learning Methodology (Behavioral)