Embedding and Evaluating Multidisciplinary Diabetes Management and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Into Primary Care for a Vulnerable Population
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Embedded Clinic
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Sponsor
- Emory University
- Enrollment
- 65
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in feasibility of intervention measure (FIM) scores
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to improve diabetes management for patients at Midtown General Internal Medicine Clinic (Aim 1). The clinic offers dedicated diabetes care on certain days with trained providers able to offer dedicated diabetes care. The clinic will also make sure to address other aspects of life and health that may impact an individual's ability to manage their diabetes - food insecurity, housing insecurity, knowing about healthy food, finding ways to exercise, and mental health. The study will also train the medical residents to be able to participate in this dedicated diabetes care (Aim 2).
Detailed Description
There is a widening quality of care gap in diabetes mellitus (DM) management that sees Black and Hispanic patients with much higher rates of DM complications and hospitalizations compared to their white counterparts. Primary Care is the frontline for DM prevention and management; however, Primary Care Clinics, including Internal Medicine resident continuity clinics, struggle to improve DM metrics. The lack of resources, such as time and personnel, is a significant limiting factor in strategies that would allow these clinics to optimize care. As a result, the current DM management model was created, in which Primary Care providers refer patients with elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to subspecialty care. This process is inefficient, overwhelms subspecialty practices, and most importantly does not address the social determinants of health that often make it difficult for patients to get their DM under control. This traditional model also comes with a potential institutional financial cost. There is a perception that reducing upfront costs of care can make a system more economically viable; yet this can have devastating results for a system and for its patients on the back end. For example, HbA1c is a Merit-based Incentive Payment System Clinical Quality Measure if a patient population is not supported in their efforts for DM control, this can translate to monetary loss annually for the Emory Healthcare System. In addition, there are also potential losses to the system related to long-term morbidity and mortality risks of elevated HbA1c over time. Studies have shown that a multi-disciplinary approach including physician, dietitian, DM education, psychotherapy, and social work services functioning concurrently and cooperatively has the potential to positively change the current paradigm. Given the vital role Primary Care plays in the management of all aspects of patient care, including physical and psychosocial well-being, this care delivery model is optimally designed to have the most impact and success in the Primary Care Clinic setting. The research team proposes to embed a multi-disciplinary diabetes-focused clinic within Primary Care in the Emory Healthcare System where this approach would create a central location for all the patients' DM needs, provide efficient care that helps patients address social and economic barriers, and engage the care team through between-clinic touchpoints to motivate patients to take agency over their health. This also provides a venue to implement modern technologies for DM management, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Despite its proven efficacy in DM management, CGM remains an understudied intervention in Primary Care, especially in patient populations that would otherwise have difficulty accessing specialty care. Researchers anticipate that these changes will enable improved adherence to follow-up visits and treatment. In addition to the benefits of streamlined patient care, this model also offers the opportunity to enhance Internal Medicine residency education. Investigators intend to develop a hybrid clinical/educational curriculum for residents that capitalizes on and models appropriate resource utilization through an integrated care model and provides early exposure to multi-disciplinary care and CGM.
Investigators
Britt A. Marshall
Assistant Professor
Emory University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Aim 1 (Embedded diabetes clinic):
- •Inclusion Criteria:
- •Patient at Midtown Diabetes Clinic
- •Able to consent
- •HbA1c \>=9%
Exclusion Criteria
- •Not planning to follow up at Midtown
- •Pregnancy
- •Followed by Endocrinology as a specialist
- •Aim 2 (Embedded diabetes clinic and curriculum):
- •Inclusion Criteria:
- •\- All residents in Midtown Primary Care are eligible
Arms & Interventions
Embedded clinic at Midtown
Using the Emory Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW), all patients of Emory Primary Care Midtown with HbA1c \>9% who are not currently under the care of an endocrinologist or the diabetes management program at Emory will be invited to participate in this embedded DM management clinic.
Intervention: Embedded Clinic
Routine Care- Dunwoody Family Medicine Clinic
The control population will be drawn using electronic health record data of diabetes patients at Dunwoody Family Medicine Clinic. Information from the Electronic Health Record will be de-identified after extraction. Control participants will be frequency matched.
Intervention: Routine Care
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in feasibility of intervention measure (FIM) scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
FIM score is a four-item measures of implementation outcomes that are often considered "leading indicators" of implementation success likert scale 1-5 with 5 being best outcome) at the baseline and 6-month follow-up visits will be used by the team members to assess the feasibility of model implementation.
Change in the proportion of embedded clinic patients with an HbA1c >9%
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Percentage of participants with HbA1c \>9% since the embedded clinic implementation. Data will be assessed from electronic medical records (EMR)
Change in acceptability of intervention measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
AIM score is a four-item measures of implementation outcomes that are often considered "leading indicators" of implementation success (likert scale 1-5 with 5 being best outcome) at the baseline and 6-month follow-up visits will be used by the team members to assess the acceptability of model implementation.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in weight(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)
- Change in anxiety score(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)
- Change in Housing Insecurity(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)
- Change in depression status(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)
- Change in food insecurity(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)
- Change in urine microalbumin(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)
- Change in body mass index (BMI)(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)
- Change in diabetes self-efficacy score(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)
- Change in the patient-reported quality of life score(Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months)