Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06219746
NCT06219746
Recruiting
Not Applicable

99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT for Primary PROstate Cancer STAging: Comparative Prospective, Randomized Trial to Present Guideline Imaging

Turku University Hospital1 site in 1 country320 target enrollmentJune 1, 2022
ConditionsProstate Cancer

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Sponsor
Turku University Hospital
Enrollment
320
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Number of subjects with local lymph node metastasi(e)s
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Prostate cancer (PCa) is currently the most common cancer in men in Finland (www.cancerregistry.fi). Although prognosis is very good in majority of men, it is noteworthy that still up to 20% of PCa cases are metastatic at the time of initial diagnosis and yearly 900 men die because of prostate cancer. Robust primary staging is, therefore, one of the most important prognostic factors, and it is crucial for treatment decision. Despite their low sensitivity to detect metastasis, bone scintigraphy (BS) and contrast enhanced whole body computed tomography (ce-wbCT) are recommended by current guidelines for primary staging in men at risk of metastasis.

MIP-1404 is a small-molecule PSMA inhibitor that can be used in SPECT systems (99mTc-MIP- 1404 SPECT/CT). 99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT is performed by a single IV bolus of 99mTc-MIP-1404, which binds with high affinity to extracellular domain of PSMA molecule. As of March 2020, a total of 629 subjects have received 99mTc-MIP-1404 injection averaging 740 ±111 MBq (20 ± 3 mCi) per administration in prospective clinical trials. 99mTc MIP-1404 has been well tolerated following a single IV dose at 740 ± 111 MBq in both healthy volunteers and patients with confirmed metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma. In prospective and retrospective studies, it has shown high potential to detect prostate cancer lesions in primary staging. In fact, Goffin et al. reported a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 87% detecting local lymph node metastasis in radically operated patients when histopathology was used as a reference. This corresponds closely to the sensitivity of PSMA-PET.

PROSTAMIP is a randomized prospective single-institutional study to demonstrate superiority of 99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT compared to traditional imaging modalities (99mTc-HMDP planar BS plus ce-wbCT).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 1, 2022
End Date
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Otto Ettala

Adjunct professor

Turku University Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects must be able and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this study protocol
  • Subjects must be male, aged 18 years or above at Baseline
  • Histopathologically confirmed high risk (Gleason ≥4+4, PSA ≥20 and/ or cT≥3a) acinar or ductal adenocarcinoma of prostate

Exclusion Criteria

  • Allergy/sensitivity to study medications or their ingredients
  • Subjects unable to provide written informed consent
  • Subjects who have any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the subject at risk by participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study.
  • Subjects who have a history of drug or alcohol use that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
  • Subjects who have androgen deprivation therapy initiated before enrolment
  • Subjects who have claustrophobia

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of subjects with local lymph node metastasi(e)s

Time Frame: Baseline

Superiority of experimental arm (99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT) in detecting subjects with local lymph node metastasi(e)s compared to control arm (ce-wbCT)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Diagnostic accuracy of detecting subjects with metastasis between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT(Baseline)
  • True positive rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT(Baseline)
  • Inter-rater agreement(Baseline)
  • False positive rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging(Baseline)
  • Effect on treatment decision(Baseline)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of detecting subjects with metastasis between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging(Baseline)
  • False negative rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging(Baseline)
  • False positive rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT(Baseline)
  • Number of subjects with metastasis(Baseline)
  • True positive rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging(Baseline)
  • False negative rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT(Baseline)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials