Evaluation of Zirconia stock and customized implant abutments provided with composite resin crowns: a pilot study
Completed
- Conditions
- Vervanging van ontbrekende gebitselementen door middel van een implantaatkroonlos of oral functionMissing tooth
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON39901
- Lead Sponsor
- niversitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
- patients should be over 18 years of age, in reasonable to good general health, as expressed by an ASA-score I or II (de Jong and Abraham-Inpijn, 1994);
- bone volume should allow the placement of implants with a minimum length of 8 mm and minimum diameter of 3.5 mm;
Exclusion Criteria
- Previous implant loss
- Irradiation to the maxilla or mandible
- Bruxism
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Primary outcome variables are:<br /><br>1. resistance to static loading bending strength in Newton), comparing<br /><br>experimental stock and CAD-CAM abutments to pristine implant-abutment copies,<br /><br>under the null hypothesis that they are similar (BS);<br /><br>2. patients* preference, comparing the digital or conventional impression<br /><br>technique as measured on a Visual Analogue Scale, under the null hypothesis<br /><br>that they are similar (PP).</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Secondary outcome variables relate to clinical performance of the implant and<br /><br>crown. Routine clinical parameters are compared between stock and CAD-CAM<br /><br>abutments after one year, namely:<br /><br>- Probing Pocket Depth (PPD);<br /><br>- Bleeding on marginal probing (BOP);<br /><br>- Recession of the mucosa (REC, difference between the value at placement of<br /><br>the crown and after one year).</p><br>