Comparison of the I-gel, Supreme and Proseal LMA in Paralyzed Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery With Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Airway Complication of Anaesthesia
- Sponsor
- Inonu University
- Enrollment
- 35
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- change of oropharyngeal leak pressure
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 12 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The investigators aimed to compare of the i-gel, supreme and proseal laryngeal mask airways in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with oropharyngeal leak pressure. The investigators also studied their relative ease of insertion, time to insertion and complications of use as secondary outcome measures.
Detailed Description
A total of 105 patients scheduled for elective gynaecological laparoscopic procedures in our Inonu University Medical Faculty Hospital were recruited.They were equally randomized into three groups: PLMA, supreme and i-gel groups. All three devices were compared with regard to oropharyngeal leak pressure, number and duration of insertion attempts and complications of airway. Oropharyngeal leak pressure will evaluate including to start,trendelenburg and postoperative at period. Fiberoptic evaluation of the LMA's position were performed after successful insertion and determination of the airway pressures. After one hour patients were evaluated by a blinded independent observer for postoperative complications ( sore throat, dysphonia and dysphagia).
Investigators
Mukadder Sanli
assistant professor
Inonu University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •18- 60 YEARS
Exclusion Criteria
- •ASA 3-4 patients
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
change of oropharyngeal leak pressure
Time Frame: 10min, 30 min ,45 min
During intraoperative period, oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured at three times (10min, 30 min, and 45 min after insertion of devices)
Secondary Outcomes
- easiness of insertion of the device(2 min)