NL-OMON54264尚未招募不适用
The effectiveness of EMDR vs EMDR 2.0 vs the Flash technique in the treatment of patients with PTSD: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Effectiveness of EMDR vs. EMDR 2.0 vs. the Flash technique
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 130
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 至 64(—)
入选标准
- •Estimated IQ > 80
- •PTSD diagnosis according to the DSM-5
- •18 years or older
- •Sufficient understanding of the Dutch language
排除标准
- •Acute suicidality
- •PTSD diagnosis not the primary diagnosis
- •Changes in medication during, or 6 weeks prior to participation in the research
- •Use of strongly sedating medication
研究者
相似试验
进行中(未招募)
不适用
The effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) 2.0 and the Flash technique with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patientsPost-traumatic stress disorderISRCTN13100019trecht University171
尚未招募
不适用
The Effectiveness of Flashforward EMDR Treatment for patients with an ICD1000752110002861anxietyNL-OMON56774Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam33
尚未招募
不适用
Treatment (AMDR) and Positive Psychotherapy in Depression and Quality of Life in Men and Women with MS.Multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosisIRCT20221228056957N1Islamic Azad University45
尚未招募
不适用
Flashforward EMDR Treatment for Patients With an ICDAnxiety and FearNCT06174051Erasmus Medical Center33
尚未招募
不适用
EMDR Flash Forward as an intervention on the mental images of worst case scenarios in paranoid delusionsschizophrenia spectrum disorder, with paranoid delusions as a core symptomNL-OMON20606MC Utrecht40
