Accuracy of 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide Compared To Thermoformed Indirect Bonding Tray
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Accuracy of Bracket Transfer and Bond Failure Rate of Digitally Printed Transfer Tray With Windows and Conventional Thermoformed Transfer TrayInaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray
- Interventions
- Device: 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning tray
- Registration Number
- NCT03585881
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
this study was aimed to evaluate of accuracy of 3DPrinted windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide in compare to Thermoformed Transfer Tray For Orthodontic Indirect Bonding
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 132
Inclusion Criteria
- Age: above 13 years.
- Complete set of permanent teeth including second molar.
- No sex predilection.
- Class I Mild to moderate crowding (4-6 mm).
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
- Surface enamel defect that compromise bonding
- No or poor patient's compliance.
- Psychological problems.
- Pathology at the site of intervention.
- Insufficient crown height that contradicts bonding of brackets.
- Labial and buccal Restorations.
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Severely rotated teeth
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description window bracket positioning tray 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning tray -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method accuracy of 3D printed transfer tray with windows& conventional thermoformed transfer tray immediate using digital measurements on 3 shape software in mm degrees
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method chairside time immediate digital stopwatch in seconds
immediate bond failure immediate counting after bonding number of brackets or tubes failed immediately