Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04492462
NCT04492462
Unknown
Not Applicable

The Impact of Two Different Physical Therapy Programs in the Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Anterior Approach Hip Replacement Surgery

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey2 sites in 1 country200 target enrollmentOctober 22, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Hip Arthritis
Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Enrollment
200
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change inHarris Hip Score (HHS)
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study will look to determine two different types of physical therapy regimens in patients who undergo anterior total hip replacement. We will compare the results of two groups. The first group, the "Formal Physical Therapy" group, will undergo standard physical therapy following their surgery. They will see a physical therapist in a physical therapy office after their surgery. Here, the therapist will work with the patient to strengthen muscles and improve their walking. The second group, the "Self-directed Physical Therapy" group, will undergo physical therapy in the comfort of their own home using common household items (chairs, steps, etc). These patients will be given a list of exercises and stretches to perform on their own. It is our goal to prove that formal physical therapy is not needed after anterior hip replacements.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 22, 2019
End Date
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Stephen Kayiaros MD

Principal Investigator, Clinical Assistant Professor

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age
  • Patients undergoing primary anterior total hip arthroplasty for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis
  • Patients with no previous invasive hip surgery (such as a previous hip replacement)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non-English speaking persons will be excluded in our study.
  • Patients with a recent history (\<1 year) of heart attack, stroke, and lung clots.
  • Previous invasive surgery on the hip undergoing replacement
  • Patients with dementia, Parkinson's, or other neurological disorders
  • Non-ambulatory patients
  • Patients with impaired ability to consent, whether because of mental illness or otherwise
  • Patients being discharged to a rehabilitation center
  • Patients that experience intra-operative complications

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change inHarris Hip Score (HHS)

Time Frame: assessed 1,3,6, and 12 months after total hip replacement to assess change at each time point following surgery

elf-administered health survey that assesses pain, function, absence of deformity, and range of motion of the hip through 10 questions. HHS measures dysfunction, so a higher score indicates a better, higher functional outcome. Less than 70 is poor result, 70-80 ia fair result, 80-90 is good result, 90-100 is excellent result

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) form(assessed 1,3,6, and 12 months after total hip replacement to assess change at each time point following surgery)
  • Change in Visual Analog Scale for Pain(assessed 1,3,6, and 12 months after total hip replacement to assess change at each time point following surgery)
  • Change in timed up and go test(assessed 1,3,6, and 12 months after total hip replacement to assess change at each time point following surgery)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials