Development of the Work In Progress Questionnaire
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Registration Number
- NCT05932043
- Lead Sponsor
- International Institute of Behavioral Medicines
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to describe the development of the Work In Progress questionnaire, a tool designed to evaluate commitment in persons, and its psychometric validation process in the context of low back pain.
- Detailed Description
The study design is cross-sectional.
The following methodology will be applied as for the development of the Work In Progress questionnaire (WIP), a tool designed to evaluate commitment in persons, and its psychometric validation:
1. item generation and selection: the first defines the content of an index and ensures the most important topics are well-thought-out. The second eliminates redundant items, and decreases the number to a total that is feasible to administer while ensuring the scale measures the construct of interest.
2. psychometric analysis: exploratory factor analysis (Cattel Scree Test, Varimax Rotation), reliability (internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 2.1), Measurement error (calculated by multiplying the standard error of measurement (SEM) by the z-score associated with the desired level of confidence (95%, in our case) and the square root of 2), and construct validity by hypothesis testing the correlations (Pearson r) with related measures (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Oswestry Disability Scale, Numerical pain Rating Scale).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Low Back Pain
- adult age
- reading/speaking Italian.
- systemic illness, mental deficits, recent cerebrovascular accidents or myocardial infarctions, chronic lung or renal diseases;
- refusal to adhere.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method WIP questionnaire After 7-10 days later the first assessment (please, see above) as concerns test-retest assessment reliability. Work In Progress questionnaire; score varying from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater commitment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method PCS At the moment of the questionnaire administration Pain Catastrophizing Scale; score varying from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater catastrophizing
ODI At the moment of the questionnaire administration Oswestry Disability Index; score varying from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater disability
pain NRS At the moment of the questionnaire administration Numerical pain Rating Scale; score varying from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Barbara Rocca
🇮🇹Calosso, Italy
Barbara Rocca🇮🇹Calosso, ItalyBarbara RoccaContact