MedPath

Development of the Work In Progress Questionnaire

Recruiting
Conditions
Low Back Pain
Registration Number
NCT05932043
Lead Sponsor
International Institute of Behavioral Medicines
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to describe the development of the Work In Progress questionnaire, a tool designed to evaluate commitment in persons, and its psychometric validation process in the context of low back pain.

Detailed Description

The study design is cross-sectional.

The following methodology will be applied as for the development of the Work In Progress questionnaire (WIP), a tool designed to evaluate commitment in persons, and its psychometric validation:

1. item generation and selection: the first defines the content of an index and ensures the most important topics are well-thought-out. The second eliminates redundant items, and decreases the number to a total that is feasible to administer while ensuring the scale measures the construct of interest.

2. psychometric analysis: exploratory factor analysis (Cattel Scree Test, Varimax Rotation), reliability (internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 2.1), Measurement error (calculated by multiplying the standard error of measurement (SEM) by the z-score associated with the desired level of confidence (95%, in our case) and the square root of 2), and construct validity by hypothesis testing the correlations (Pearson r) with related measures (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Oswestry Disability Scale, Numerical pain Rating Scale).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Low Back Pain
  • adult age
  • reading/speaking Italian.
Exclusion Criteria
  • systemic illness, mental deficits, recent cerebrovascular accidents or myocardial infarctions, chronic lung or renal diseases;
  • refusal to adhere.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
WIP questionnaireAfter 7-10 days later the first assessment (please, see above) as concerns test-retest assessment reliability.

Work In Progress questionnaire; score varying from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater commitment

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
PCSAt the moment of the questionnaire administration

Pain Catastrophizing Scale; score varying from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater catastrophizing

ODIAt the moment of the questionnaire administration

Oswestry Disability Index; score varying from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater disability

pain NRSAt the moment of the questionnaire administration

Numerical pain Rating Scale; score varying from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Barbara Rocca

🇮🇹

Calosso, Italy

Barbara Rocca
🇮🇹Calosso, Italy
Barbara Rocca
Contact

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.