Efficacy Evaluation of Dotarem Compared to Gadovist in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT01026389
- Lead Sponsor
- Guerbet
- Brief Summary
This study is an efficacy evaluation of Dotarem®-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) compared to Gadovist®-enhanced MRA in the diagnosis of clinically significant abdominal or lower limb arterial diseases.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 189
- Male or female, aged ≥ 18 years.
- Patient with infrarenal aorta or chronic lower limb ischemia with various clinical signs of gravity (stages II-IV according to the classification of Leriche and Fontaine) or/and Doppler ultrasonography indicating abdominal or lower limb arteriopathy.
- Patient scheduled for a conventional X-Ray angiography (intra-arterial Digital Substraction Angiography = DSA) within 30 days of MRA with a minimum time interval of at least 24 hours between the 2 examinations.
- Patient planned to undergo therapeutic intervention in abdominal or lower limb vessels between the time of MRA and X-ray Angiography will be performed.
- Patient who had a major cardiovascular event within 30 days prior to the inclusion.
- Patient treated with unilateral hip replacement, abdominal aortic or iliac graft or stent.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Gadovist Gadovist Patient received contrast-enhanced MRA with Gadovist Dotarem, interventional Dotarem Patients received contrast-enhanced MRA with Dotarem
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intra-patient Accuracy (Percent Agreement), On-site Data up to one month intra-patient accuracy (percent agreement) of each type of MRA examination (Dotarem® or Gadovist®-enhanced MRA) in assessing the lesions of the concerned territory as compared with the gold standard, X-ray angiography.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intra-patient Accuracy, in Off-site Readings up to one month • Intra-patient accuracy (percent agreement) of each type of MRA examination (Dotarem® or Gadovist®-enhanced MRA) in assessing the lesions of the concerned territory as compared with the gold standard, X-ray angiography, in off-site readings, using the same methodology as that used for the primary criterion
Specificity up to one month Specificity of Dotarem® and Gadovist®-enhanced MRA examinations at the segment and the patient levels (gold standard = x-ray angiography) in on-site readings; no stenosis and non significant stenosis were grouped as one class (non significant stenosis = negative segment).
Sensitivity up to one month sensitivity of Dotarem® and Gadovist®-enhanced MRA examinations at the segment and the patient levels (gold standard = x-ray angiography) in on-site; moderate, severe stenosis and occlusion were grouped as one class (significant stenosis = positive segment).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
AKH hospital
🇦🇹Wien, Austria