Randomized Double Blind Controlled Prospective Study to Evaluate the Influence of Electromagnetic Field as an Adjunctive Non Surgical Treatment in Implant With Peri-implantitis
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Peri-Implantitis
- Sponsor
- Rambam Health Care Campus
- Enrollment
- 23
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in the implant probing depth (IPD)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
the aim of the study is to compare between two non-surgical methods of treatment of peri-implantitis by using debridement and placing an healing abutment with electomagnetic field (MED-Magdent Miniaturized Device) in the test group and Sham healing abutment in the control group ( Sham MED).
Detailed Description
Dental Implants are common alternative for replacement at the time of tooth loss. The two common methods for treatment implant with inflammation include surgical and global non-surgical treatment. The non-surgical treatment includes soft tissue debridement with various tools which including manual, ultrasonic rotators, lasers and delayed release devices. Using an electromagnetic field to induce bony healing in fractures and around implants is being investigated for studies and was found to be effective and safe. The electric field lowers osteoclasts activity, speeds up osteoid construction and stimulates creation blood vessels development. Forty patients who will attend to the department of periodontology at Rambam health care campus, at the School ofpostgraduate Dentistry, which will meet the research criteria, will be recruited. All patients will exhibit a moderate-onset gum infection around one of the implants.
Investigators
Hadar Zigdon MD
Rambam Health Care Campus
Rambam Health Care Campus
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Written informed consent.
- •Patients of 20 - 85 years.
- •pocket depth of 5-8 mm and bone loss of 3-5mm Patients with fixed prosthodontics Implant with standart width
Exclusion Criteria
- •Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day).
- •Pregnant women
- •active periodontal disease
- •Consumption of Non Steroidal Anti Inflammatory drugs
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in the implant probing depth (IPD)
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
clinical measurement of the depth of the pocket around the implant in 6 sites
Secondary Outcomes
- changing in the concentration of the RANKL cytokine(baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks)