Prospective.Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Chronic IDE Study of the Effects of Pacing on Mitral Regurgitation in Patients Without Standard Indications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Mitral Regurgitation
- Sponsor
- Trinity Medical Center, Illinois
- Enrollment
- 50
- Primary Endpoint
- Chronic(8 months post-implant) benefit of MR reduction
- Last Updated
- 15 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to show that CRT(Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) pacing in patients with severe functional MR (Mitral Regurgitation) who are not currently indicated for CRT will demonstrate chronic benefit of MR reduction( via echo measured MR/LA area and ERO per American Society of ECHO guidelines) and to show that CRT pacing is safe in these patients.
Detailed Description
Approximately 50 patients will be randomized, followed and analyzed in this prospective study. Patients who meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria will be enrolled and implanted with a CRT system. Baseline evaluation, which includes clinical symptom evaluation and an echocardiogram, will be performed at the time of randomization, which should occur as soon after device implant as possible but no later than 2 week post -implant. The baseline echocardiogram should be acquired prior to the device being programmed to the randomized setting. Repeat echocardiograms and scheduled follow-up evaluations will be performed at the end of each 3 month crossover period.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patient is at least 18 years of age
- •Patients with moderate-to-severe or severe functional MR.
- •EROA \> 40 mm2 and an MR/LA \> 40% (severe)
- •30 ≤ EROA ≤ 40 mm2 and 30 ≤ MR/LA ≤ 40% (moderate-to-severe)
- •Baseline rates of 50-90 beats per minute (patients with sinus rhythm) or AF
- •QRS \< 120 ms
- •LVEF \< 35%
- •Willing to sign informed consent
- •On standard stable heart failure medical regimen (beta blockers and ACE-I or ARBs) for at least 1 month before randomization, if tolerated
- •Patient has the ability to understand the requirements of the study, including consent for use and disclosure of research-related information
Exclusion Criteria
- •candidate for CRT or has a previously implanted CRT device
- •previously implanted implantable pulse generators (IPG) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with at least 10 % pacing in the right ventricle
- •patient has life expectancy \<6 months
- •patient is pregnant
- •significant aortic stenosis
- •uncontrolled hypertension
- •mitral valve stenosis
- •severe mitral valve calcification
- •ruptured chordae tendinae or papillary muscle
- •mitral valve leaflet disorders (i.e. endocarditis, lupus, tumors, rheumatic heart disease)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Chronic(8 months post-implant) benefit of MR reduction
Time Frame: Chronic
To show that CRT pacing in patients with severe functional MR who are not currently indicated for CRT will demonstrate chronic(8 months post-implant) benefit of MR reduction (via echo measured MR/LA area and ERO per American Society of Echo guidelines)
Secondary Outcomes
- To compare MR Severity (ERO and MR/LA area), heart volume and dimensions via echo and clinical symptoms between two pacing modalities(Chronic)