MedPath

Split-face Tolerability Comparison Between MetroGel® 1% vs Finacea® 15% in Subjects With Healthy Skin

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Skin Manifestations
Interventions
Drug: azelaic acid 15% gel
Registration Number
NCT01139047
Lead Sponsor
Galderma R&D
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of MetroGel® 1% to Finacea® 15% in subjects with healthy skin applied according to product labeling for three weeks.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
77
Inclusion Criteria
  • Healthy male and female adults (ages 18 years or older)
  • Subjects with healthy skin as determined by the clinical grader
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with a degree of skin pigmentation that interferes with the reading of skin reactions
  • Subjects with known allergy to one of the components of the study drugs (refer to the package inserts for MetroGel® 1% and Finacea® Gel 15%)
  • Subjects who have participated in another investigational drug or device research study within 30 days of enrollment
  • Subjects with a washout period for topical treatment on the treated area less than 1 week for corticosteroids and/or 4 weeks for retinoids
  • Subjects with a washout period for systemic treatment less than 1 week for medications that may increase photosensitivity and/or 4 weeks for corticosteroids and/or 6 months for retinoids
  • Subjects with current sunburn, eczema, atopic dermatitis, perioral dermatitis, rosacea, or other topical conditions on the area to be treated
  • Subjects who foresee unprotected and intense UV exposure during the study (mountain sports, UV radiation, sunbathing, etc.)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
metronidazole 1% gelmetronidazole 1% gel-
azelaic acid 15% gelazelaic acid 15% gel-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3baseline to week 3

Number of participants who were a success with regard to worst post-baseline tolerability scores in each of the tolerability assessments at any time point between baseline and week 3. Tolerability assessments (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) are evaluated on a scale from 0 - 4 (0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) with 0 being best and 4 being worst. Success was defined as a tolerability score of 0.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 33 weeks

Number of participants per response to each question of the subject preference survey at week 3

Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22day 22

Number of participants who were a success with regard to worst-baseline tolerability assessment scores for each assessment (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) on day 22. Tolerability assessments (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) are evaluated on a scale from 0 - 4 (0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) with 0 being best and 4 being worst. Success was defined as a tolerability score of 0 for each assessment.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Thomas J. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

🇺🇸

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath