Split-face Tolerability Comparison Between MetroGel® 1% vs Finacea® 15% in Subjects With Healthy Skin
- Conditions
- Skin Manifestations
- Interventions
- Drug: azelaic acid 15% gel
- Registration Number
- NCT01139047
- Lead Sponsor
- Galderma R&D
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of MetroGel® 1% to Finacea® 15% in subjects with healthy skin applied according to product labeling for three weeks.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 77
- Healthy male and female adults (ages 18 years or older)
- Subjects with healthy skin as determined by the clinical grader
- Subjects with a degree of skin pigmentation that interferes with the reading of skin reactions
- Subjects with known allergy to one of the components of the study drugs (refer to the package inserts for MetroGel® 1% and Finacea® Gel 15%)
- Subjects who have participated in another investigational drug or device research study within 30 days of enrollment
- Subjects with a washout period for topical treatment on the treated area less than 1 week for corticosteroids and/or 4 weeks for retinoids
- Subjects with a washout period for systemic treatment less than 1 week for medications that may increase photosensitivity and/or 4 weeks for corticosteroids and/or 6 months for retinoids
- Subjects with current sunburn, eczema, atopic dermatitis, perioral dermatitis, rosacea, or other topical conditions on the area to be treated
- Subjects who foresee unprotected and intense UV exposure during the study (mountain sports, UV radiation, sunbathing, etc.)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description metronidazole 1% gel metronidazole 1% gel - azelaic acid 15% gel azelaic acid 15% gel -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3 baseline to week 3 Number of participants who were a success with regard to worst post-baseline tolerability scores in each of the tolerability assessments at any time point between baseline and week 3. Tolerability assessments (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) are evaluated on a scale from 0 - 4 (0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) with 0 being best and 4 being worst. Success was defined as a tolerability score of 0.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 3 3 weeks Number of participants per response to each question of the subject preference survey at week 3
Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22 day 22 Number of participants who were a success with regard to worst-baseline tolerability assessment scores for each assessment (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) on day 22. Tolerability assessments (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) are evaluated on a scale from 0 - 4 (0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) with 0 being best and 4 being worst. Success was defined as a tolerability score of 0 for each assessment.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Thomas J. Stephens & Associates, Inc.
🇺🇸Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States