跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03481140
NCT03481140已完成不适用

Post-Market, Investigator Initiated, Retrospective, Audited Observational Case Series Comparing SWC With Drains to SWC With TissuGlu® and no Drains in a Donor Site DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Procedure in 58 Patients

Cohera Medical, Inc.0 个研究点目标入组 58 人开始时间: 2015年4月21日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
58
主要终点
number of post-operative clinical interventions related to wound fluid management at the donor site

研究概览

简要总结

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a lysine-derived urethane adhesive (TissuGlu® Surgical Adhesive) as a less invasive alternative to surgical drains in the abdominal donor site for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • be 18 years of age or older
  • be in good general health (with no conditions that would, in the opinion of the surgeon, exclude them from a drain-free donor site approach)
  • have a body mass index (BMI) < 28
  • have received a DIEP flap breast reconstruction procedure

排除标准

  • current smoker
  • have a body mass index (BMI) > 28
  • taking active SSRI medication prescriptions

结局指标

主要结局

number of post-operative clinical interventions related to wound fluid management at the donor site

时间窗: 6 weeks post-operatively

number of interventions

次要结局

  • total wound drainage(6 weeks post-operatively)
  • cumulative drain volume(6 weeks post-operatively)
  • days to drain removal(6 weeks post-operatively)
  • aspiration volume(6 weeks post-operatively)
  • cumulative days of invasive treatment(6 weeks post-operatively)

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验

Case Series Comparing Drains to TissuGlu® in a Donor... | 临床试验