跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03708393
NCT03708393已完成不适用

Imagio Feasibility Multi-Reader, Multi-Case Study of Optoacoustic Images Versus Imagio Ultrasound to Guide Decision to Biopsy

Seno Medical Instruments Inc.2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 155 人开始时间: 2018年11月13日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
155
试验地点
2
主要终点
The Gain in Imagio IUS Alone Specificity vs Imagio (IUS+OA) Specificity at Fixed 95-99% Sensitivity (fSp), Cohort 1

研究概览

简要总结

Controlled, blinded, multi-reader, multi-case study

详细描述

The Imagio Feasibility Reader Study-01 Study is intended to evaluate if a subsequent pivotal study can be implemented to test prospective hypotheses for pre-specified effectiveness endpoints with an acceptable sample size. The Feasibility Study will be based on ITD masses from the PIONEER (NCT01943916) Pivotal study to simultaneously reflect the distributions with and without mammograms as well as site CDU BI-RADS scores within benign and malignant masses as strata. The study population will be split into 3 cohorts - Cohort 1, the 120 patient ITD Population used to run the primary/ secondary analyses. Cohort 2, 30 patients used to run exploratory analyses on false negative rate and Cohort 3, 5 patients used to run exploratory analyses on specific mass types

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Independent Readers blinded to mass diagnosis

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Female subjects participating in the PIONEER-0 Study of the Imagio Breast Imaging System with known clinical status

排除标准

  • Female subjects who did not have known clinical status in the PIONEER-0 Study of the Imagio Breast Imaging System with known clinical status

结局指标

主要结局

The Gain in Imagio IUS Alone Specificity vs Imagio (IUS+OA) Specificity at Fixed 95-99% Sensitivity (fSp), Cohort 1

时间窗: Baseline to 12 month follow-up

Primary effectiveness endpoint was the specificity of Imagio \[IUS+OA\] compared to IUS alone at fixed 95-99% sensitivity (fSp) interpolated from the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, averaged across all 10 independent readers. Both imaging modalities (IUS alone and IUS+OA) were read for each subject (subject as own control). Results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth).

次要结局

  • BiRads [Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System] Downgrades and Upgrades- Cohort 1(Imagio [IUS+OA] and IUS readings relative to biopsy results and TRUTH PANEL review of NDU cases with follow-up at 12 months)
  • SenoGram Performance(Imagio [IUS+OA] and IUS readings relative to biopsy results and TRUTH PANEL review of NDU cases with follow-up at 12 months)
  • The Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR) for IUS vs. Imagio® (IUS+OA), Cohort 1(Imagio [IUS+OA] and IUS readings relative to biopsy results and TRUTH PANEL review of NDU cases with follow-up at 12 months (≥11 months))
  • Partial Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (pAUC), Cohort 1(Imagio [IUS+OA] and IUS readings relative to biopsy results and TRUTH PANEL review of NDU cases with follow-up at 12 months (≥11 months))
  • SenoGram Usage Cohort 1 for Imagio (IUS+OA) Only(Imagio [IUS+OA] and IUS readings relative to biopsy results and TRUTH PANEL review of NDU cases with follow-up at 12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验