EUCTR2013-004646-42-SEActive, not recruitingNot Applicable
A randomized, evaluator-blinded, comparative study toevaluate the efficacy and safety of different injection volumes of botulinum toxin type A, Azzalure®, in the glabellar lines.
Conditions
Drugs
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Sponsor
- Q-MED AB
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- Female
Inclusion Criteria
- •1. Women, 18 to 64 years of age (at screening visit).
- •2. Subjects seeking treatment for moderate to severe glabellar lines (grade 2-3 at rest using ‘Merz Aestethic Scale for Glabellar lines at rest’) when the severity of these lines has an important psychological impact on the subject, as determined by the investigator.
- •Are the trial subjects under 18? no
- •Number of subjects for this age range:
- •F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes
- •F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 60
- •F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no
- •F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0
Exclusion Criteria
- •1. Subjects previously treated with any botulinum toxin product.
- •2. Pregnant or breast feeding women or women intending to get pregnant in the next 12 months.
- •3. Subjects with signs and symptoms of eyelid or brow ptosis or signs of compensatory frontalis muscle activity, as judged by the investigator.
- •4. Subjects with clinical or subclinical neuromuscular junctional disorders (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Lambert Eaton syndrome or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) or a history of dysphagia or aspiration.
- •5. Subjects with previous or current diagnosis of Bell’s paresis.
- •6. Subjects with known bleeding disorders or subjects who are taking thrombolytics or anticoagulants.
- •7. Subjects who are taking anticholinergics or aminoglycoside antibiotics.
- •8. Subjects with active inflammation or infection in the areas to be treated.
- •9. Subjects with known hypersensitivity to any compound of the study products used in the study.
- •10. Any prior surgery in the facial area that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the results.
- •11. Subjects treated with fillers, HA filler or permanent filler, in the upper face one year or less from screening.
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded Comparative Study of Potassium Titanyl Phosphate (KTP) 532-nm Picosecond Laser and Alexandrite 755-nm Picosecond Laser for the Treatment of solar Lentigines in AsiansReduction of solar lentigineslaseraging spothyperpigmentationSolar lentiginesTCTR20210408004Division of Dermatology, Department of medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi hospital30
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A randomized, evaluator-blind comparative study with a long-term extension to evaluate performance and safety of Belotero® Balance and no-treatment control for the treatment of facial acne scarsfacial acne scarsL90.5Scar conditions and fibrosis of skinDRKS00021121Rosenpark Research GmbH40
Completed
Phase 4
A randomized, double-blind comparative study comparing Ferric Carboxymaltose (Ferinject) and Iron Isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer) for iron substitution in iron-deficiency anemiaMedDRA - 10002062 (Anaemia iron deficiency)ICD 10: D50D50Iron deficiency anaemiaDRKS00010766niversität des Saarlandes26
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A controlled, randomized, evaluator-blinded study for the assessment of efficacy and safety of Imazol® Paste and Multilind® Heilsalbe in infants with diaper dermatitisEUCTR2006-001184-29-DESpirig Pharma AG102
Completed
Phase 4
A study comparing two brands of similar suture materials (Trusynth Fast�® and Vicryl Rapide�®) for suturing after vaginal deliveryCTRI/2020/12/029925Healthium Medtech Pvt Ltd100
