aeRobic Exercise and Cognitive Health

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Aging
Alzheimer's Disease

Interventions: Behavioral: Enhanced Physical Activity

Registration Number: NCT02384993

Lead Sponsor: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Brief Summary: The purpose of the aeRobic Exercise and Cognitive Health (REACH) study is to understand how an aerobic exercise intervention might help promote brain health and cognition, thereby delaying the onset of clinical symptoms of Alzheimer's disease.

Detailed Description: The prevalence and costs associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are projected to increase exponentially owing to the unprecedented expansion in the elderly segment of the United States' population. Given this looming specter, delaying the onset of AD symptoms and curbing the progression of the underlying disease process has become a national public health imperative. Delaying symptom onset by as little as 5 years could reduce the prevalence of AD by half. Unfortunately, currently available drug treatments for AD are not curative. Similarly, clinical trials testing novel disease-modifying therapeutics have been disappointing. The urgency of alternative approaches for halting the global crisis posed by AD cannot be overstated.

Animal studies have demonstrated that aerobic exercise (EXER) is a low-cost, low-risk intervention capable of altering the AD pathological process. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EXER in older adults have also revealed its beneficial effects on AD-relevant measures such as brain glucose metabolism and memory/executive function. Importantly, a recent evidence review found that of 7 key modifiable risk factors for AD, physical activity had the highest impact on reducing the national prevalence of AD. However, there are presently no RCTs examining the effects of EXER in middle-aged, asymptomatic individuals at increased risk of AD. This is an important knowledge gap for several reasons. Interventions to halt the AD pathological cascade are more likely to be effective if implemented prior to pervasive neuronal damage. Secondly, persons with specific risk factors for developing AD (such as parental family history (FH)) represent a choice target population for any credible attempts at reducing the growing burden of AD. Lastly, a key limitation of prior EXER RCTs is the failure to adequately account for participants' physical activity levels outside of the intervention.

Accordingly, the main objective of this study is to pilot a 26-week trial of EXER among asymptomatic, middle-aged adults with and without family history (FH) of AD enrolled in the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP) or the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (WADRC). The investigators' near-term goal is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this structured intervention and preliminarily evaluate (i) its effect on AD-relevant outcomes such as glucose metabolism and (ii) the mechanism for such effects. The investigators' longer-term goal is to use the data gathered via this pilot to further refine the intervention, estimate effect sizes for key outcomes, and seek NIH funding for a longer and more definitive assessment of whether EXER can effectively curtail AD progression in midlife. The specific aims are:

AIM 1: Determine the feasibility and acceptability of a 26-week, 3-4 days per week, structured EXER regimen among middle-aged adults with FH of AD. Hypothesis: The investigators will successfully enroll the 30 participants (15 each in EXER and usual physical activity groups) targeted for this study. At least 90% of the participants within the EXER group, called the enhanced physical activity group, will complete ≥80% of scheduled training sessions.

AIM 2: Preliminarily characterize the effect of the EXER intervention on AD-related brain alteration. Hypothesis: Compared to participants randomized to the usual physical activity group, those randomized to the enhanced physical activity group will demonstrate preserved brain glucose metabolism. Similar effects will be seen in secondary outcomes including cerebral blood flow, hippocampal volume, vascular health, memory/executive function, and mood.

AIM 3: Preliminarily evaluate (i) the biological mechanisms by which EXER affects brain health and cognition, and (ii) the individual difference factors that potentially moderate EXER's effects. Hypotheses: (i) Persons in the enhanced physical activity group will exhibit significant increases in circulating neurotrophins and improved cardiorespiratory fitness, and (ii) the beneficial effects of EXER will be more pronounced for participants with decreased sedentary behaviors outside of the intervention (measured via accelerometry).

AIM 4: Preliminarily determine whether EXER improves vascular health. Hypothesis: Individuals in the enhanced physical activity group will exhibit comparatively increased cerebral blood flow, and improved endothelial function.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 24

Inclusion Criteria

Age between 45 and 80 at baseline visit.
Must be currently physically inactive (i.e. not meeting national guidelines of 150+ minutes per week of moderate exercise).
Participant is not pregnant at the time of the positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging exams.
Willing and able to complete all assessments and exercise intervention faithfully.
Fluent and proficient in English language and capable of completing neuropsychological testing in English.
Participant must have physician clearance to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

Any significant neurologic disease, such as Parkinson's disease, multi-infarct dementia, Huntington's disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, brain tumor, progressive supranuclear palsy, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, or history of significant head trauma (10 min or more of loss of consciousness) followed by persistent neurologic deficits or known structural brain abnormalities.
Presence of pacemakers, aneurysm clips, artificial heart valves, ear implants, metal fragments, or foreign objects in the eyes, skin, body. X-ray may be used to establish suitability for MRI.
Inability to complete exercise test due to medical restrictions such as hip surgery, knee surgery, arthritis, or other orthopedic concerns that prevent being able to walk on a treadmill, type I or II diabetes mellitus, and documented vascular disease such as coronary artery disease.
Clinically significant findings from the exercise test that prohibit participation in moderate intensity exercise (i.e. 3rd degree heart block).
Current Axis I DSM-IV disorder including but not limited to major depression within the past two years, history of bipolar I disorder, history of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (DSM IV criteria).
History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (DSM IV criteria).
Any significant systemic illness or unstable medical condition that could affect cognition, CBF or BOLD, or cause difficulty complying with the exam. History of chemotherapy, thyroid disease, or renal insufficiency are excluded.
Severe untreated hypertension (>200/100mmHG).
Participants who do not have the cognitive competence and legal capacity to make informed medical decisions are excluded at entry. If a participant experiences significant cognitive decline during the study such that they no longer have medical decision making capacity the investigators will enact procedures that have been approved locally by the IRB and legal counsel at the University of Wisconsin-Madison: A) use their initial expressed and written consent as an indicator of willingness to continue to participate in the study; AND B) require that they provide assent at the time of follow-up visits witnessed and counter signed by their caregiver; AND C) signed consent from the patient's legally authorized representative.
Current use of antipsychotic medications such as non-SSRI antidepressants, neuroleptics, chronic anxiolytics, or sedative hypnotics, as well as some cardiac glycosides such as Digoxin.
Investigational agents are prohibited.
Exceptions to these criteria will be rare but may be considered on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the investigators in consultation with study physicians.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Enhanced Physical Activity	Enhanced Physical Activity	Those assigned to the enhanced physical activity group will train 3-4 days per week with the goal of attaining current public health recommendations of 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise by the 7th week of training, and maintaining this level of exercise for the remainder of the 26-week intervention. A gradual increase in exercise intensity and duration will be used throughout this twenty-six week exercise intervention, with the initial speed and duration calibrated to each participant's baseline aerobic capacity. Training will occur in individual sessions supervised by exercise specialists with the appropriate education and experience. Each training session will begin with an appropriate warm-up, slowly build up, and end with an appropriate cool down period.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Acceptability: Percentage of Sessions Completed by Enhanced Physical Activity Group	up to 26 weeks	This intervention will be considered acceptable if participants who complete the Enhanced Physical Activity intervention, complete ≥80% of scheduled training sessions.
Feasibility: Percentage of Participants Who Completed the Study	up to 3 years	Feasibility is in part defined as at least 90% of enrolled participants completed the study.
Cerebral Glucose Metabolism as Measured by FDG PET Scanning	over 26 weeks (assessed at baseline visit and at week-26 visit)	Changes in cerebral glucose metabolism will be assessed using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning. This method measures the brain's use of blood sugar while in a resting state. Measurements were taken in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). An increase in this measure indicates an increase in the brain's uptake and usage of blood sugar.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score	up to 26 weeks (assessed at baseline and 26 weeks)	The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) measures global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
California Verbal Learning Test-II Long Delay Score	over 26 weeks (assessed at baseline visit and at week-26 visit)	The California Verbal Learning Test-II assesses cognitive function. Long delay is a test where there is a 20 minute time period between initial word list presented and recall. Higher scores indicate more words recalled. Scores range from 0 to 20.
Ultrasound-Measured Cerebral Blood Flow - Mean Flow Velocity	over 26 weeks (assessed at baseline visit and at week-26 visit)	Cerebral blood flow velocity changes in the middle cerebral artery will be measured using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound imaging.
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Color Word Interference (D-KEFS CWI) Score	up to 26 weeks (measured at baseline and 26 weeks)	The D-KEFS CWI will be used to measure executive function. Lower times indicate improved executive function. Scores range from 0 to 90.
California Verbal Learning Test-II Total Score	over 26 weeks (assessed at baseline visit and at week-26 visit)	The California Verbal Learning Test-II assesses cognitive function. Higher scores indicate more words recalled. Scores range from 0 to 100.
Change in Hippocampal Volume	up to 26 weeks (assessed at baseline and 26 weeks)	Hippocampal volume will be assessed using T1-weighted 3T MRI images.
Profile of Mood States (POMS) Score	up to 26 weeks (assessed at baseline and 26 weeks)	The Profile of Mood States was used to assess mood. POMS is divided into six subscales including tension-anxiety (9 items, score range: 0-36), depression (15 items, range: 0-60), anger-hostility (12 items, range: 0-48), vigor-activity (8 items, range: 0-32), fatigue (7 items, range: 0-28), and confusion-bewilderment (7 items, range: 0-28). Total mood disturbance is calculated by adding five of the six subscales (Tension, Depression, Anger, Fatigue, and Confusion) and subtracting Vigor (Scores range from -32 to 200). Lower scores typically indicate more steady mood profiles. Higher scores indicate more mood disturbance.