跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05958316
NCT05958316
招募中
不适用

A Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Heuristic Tool To Improve Symptom Self-Management in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

Virginia Commonwealth University8 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 126 人2024年1月4日

概览

阶段
不适用
干预措施
Computerized Symptom Capture Tool (C-SCAT) Intervention
疾病 / 适应症
Symptoms and Signs
发起方
Virginia Commonwealth University
入组人数
126
试验地点
8
主要终点
Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on the primary outcomes of self-efficacy for symptom management immediately post intervention (Time 1) by comparing the scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®; PROMIS® Scale.
状态
招募中
最后更新
19天前

概览

简要总结

Determine the effects of the Computerized Symptom Assessment Tool (C-SCAT) versus usual care on the primary outcomes of self-efficacy for symptom management and symptom self-management behaviors

详细描述

This is a multi-site two-group randomized control trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effects of the Computerized Symptom Assessment Tool (C-SCAT) for improving symptom self-management versus usual care in 126 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who are within the first three months of a diagnosis of cancer and who are receiving cancer treatment. For this study, cancer treatment will be defined as a prescribed infusion ( e.g., chemotherapy, immunotherapy).

注册库
clinicaltrials.gov
开始日期
2024年1月4日
结束日期
2027年8月31日
最后更新
19天前
研究类型
Interventional
研究设计
Parallel
性别
All

研究者

责任方
Sponsor

入排标准

入选标准

  • Has received at least 1 cycle of cancer treatment and is within 3 months of initial cancer diagnosis
  • Receiving regularly scheduled cancer treatment and will be receiving at least three more cycles
  • Reports at least 1 symptom related to cancer and/or its treatment
  • Able to speak, read, and write English as required for completion of the C-SCAT and study measures

排除标准

  • \- Cognitive and/or physical inability to complete study measures.

研究组 & 干预措施

Computerized Symptom Assessment Tool C-SCAT

Participants will be asked to complete the C-SCAT at three of their clinic visits for cancer treatment in addition to usual care for assessing symptoms. This intervention period will last up to about 12 weeks, depending on cancer treatment schedule (for example, every 2, 3 or 4 weeks).

干预措施: Computerized Symptom Capture Tool (C-SCAT) Intervention

Usual Care Control Group

Participants will follow usual care for cancer symptoms for up to 12 weeks, depending on how cancer treatment schedule (for example, every 2, 3 or 4 weeks).

干预措施: Usual Care Control

结局指标

主要结局

Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on the primary outcomes of self-efficacy for symptom management immediately post intervention (Time 1) by comparing the scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®; PROMIS® Scale.

时间窗: 2 weeks post intervention (Timepoint 1)

Self-efficacy for symptom management will be assessed with the PROMIS® Self Efficacy for Symptom Management Scale that contains 28 items and assess the person's current level of confidence to manage/control symptoms, manage symptoms in different settings, and keep symptoms from interfering with work, relationships, or activities. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (1=I am not confident at all; 5=I am very confident). Scores are summed across items, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy

Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on the primary outcomes of symptom self-management behaviors immediately post intervention (Time 1) by comparing the scores from the Symptom Self-management Behaviors Tool (SSMBT).

时间窗: 2 weeks post intervention (Timepoint 1)

The SSMBT contains 12 items with two subscales: Manage Symptoms (8 items) that addresses behaviors related to managing their symptoms, and Talk to Healthcare Provider (4 items) that addresses behaviors related to communicating with their HCP about their symptoms. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale (0=never/rarely; 4=always). Scores are summed across all items. Higher scores indicate higher engagement in SS-M behaviors.

Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on the primary outcomes of symptom self-management behaviors at follow up (Time 2) by comparing the scores from the Symptom Self-management Behaviors Tool (SSMBT).

时间窗: 4 weeks following Timepoint 1 (Timepoint 2)

The SSMBT contains 12 items with two subscales: Manage Symptoms (8 items) that addresses behaviors related to managing their symptoms, and Talk to Healthcare Provider (4 items) that addresses behaviors related to communicating with their HCP about their symptoms. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale (0=never/rarely; 4=always). Scores are summed across all items. Higher scores indicate higher engagement in SS-M behaviors.

Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on the primary outcomes of self-efficacy for symptom management at follow up (Time 2) by comparing the scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®; PROMIS® Scale.

时间窗: 4 weeks following Timepoint 1 (Timepoint 2)

Self-efficacy for symptom management will be assessed with the PROMIS® Self Efficacy for Symptom Management Scale that contains 28 items and assess the person's current level of confidence to manage/control symptoms, manage symptoms in different settings, and keep symptoms from interfering with work, relationships, or activities. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (1=I am not confident at all; 5=I am very confident). Scores are summed across items, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy

Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on the primary outcomes of self-efficacy for symptom management immediately post intervention (Time 1) by comparing the scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®; PROMIS® Scale.

时间窗: Baseline- Week 0

Self-efficacy for symptom management will be assessed with the PROMIS® Self Efficacy for Symptom Management Scale that contains 28 items and assess the person's current level of confidence to manage/control symptoms, manage symptoms in different settings, and keep symptoms from interfering with work, relationships, or activities. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (1=I am not confident at all; 5=I am very confident). Scores are summed across items, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy

Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on the primary outcomes of symptom self-management behaviors immediately post intervention (Time 1) by comparing the scores from the Symptom Self-management Behaviors Tool (SSMBT).

时间窗: Baseline- Week 0

The SSMBT contains 12 items with two subscales: Manage Symptoms (8 items) that addresses behaviors related to managing their symptoms, and Talk to Healthcare Provider (4 items) that addresses behaviors related to communicating with their HCP about their symptoms. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale (0=never/rarely; 4=always). Scores are summed across all items. Higher scores indicate higher engagement in SS-M behaviors.

次要结局

  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (symptom distress), at baseline, by comparing the scores from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS).(Baseline- Week 0)
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (symptom severity) at baseline, by comparing the scores from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS).(Baseline-Week 0)
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (social function) immediately post intervention (Time 1) by comparing the PROMIS SF v2.0 Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities scores.(2 weeks post intervention (Timepoint 1))
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (symptom severity) immediately post intervention (Time 1) by comparing the scores from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS).(2 weeks post intervention (Timepoint 1))
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (social function) post intervention (Time 2) by comparing the PROMIS SF v2.0 Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities scores.(4 weeks following Timepoint 1 (Timepoint 2))
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (satisfaction with social function) post intervention (Time 2) by comparing the PROMIS SF v2.0 Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities.(4 weeks following Timepoint 1 (Timepoint 2))
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (symptom distress) immediately post intervention (Time 1) by comparing the scores from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS).(2 weeks post intervention (Timepoint 1))
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (social function) at baseline, by comparing the PROMIS SF v2.0 Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities scores.(Baseline- Week 0)
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (symptom severity) immediately post intervention (Time 2) by comparing the scores from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS).(4 weeks following Timepoint 1 (Timepoint 2))
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (symptom distress) immediately post intervention (Time 2) by comparing the scores from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS).(4 weeks following Timepoint 1 (Timepoint 2))
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (satisfaction with social function) post intervention (Time 2) by comparing the PROMIS SF v2.0 Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities.(Baseline -week 0)
  • Effects of the C-SCAT versus usual care on secondary outcomes (satisfaction with social function) post intervention (Time 2) by comparing the PROMIS SF v2.0 Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities.(2 weeks post intervention (Timepoint 1))

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验