MedPath

GLUtEus Maximus Fascia Plasty Flap for Pilonidal Sinus

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Pilonidal Sinus
Interventions
Procedure: Primary Closure
Procedure: Gluteus Maximus Fascia Plasty Flap
Registration Number
NCT03914729
Lead Sponsor
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
Brief Summary

Surgical treatment is still gold standard for pilonidal sinus disease. Several surgical techniques have been proposed to treat this disease in the last two decades. A new method - midline excision of pilonidal sinus and wound closure using gluteus maximus fascia plasty flap (GMFF) - was proposed recently as a new method of treatment that results in low reccurence rate and good cosmetic results.

The aim of this study is to compare a new method (GMFF) with a traditional method (midline excision and primary closure) in terms of recurrence rate, complications and patient satisfaction with results.

Detailed Description

Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a rather rare benign condition (about 26 cases per 100,000 population) that affects primarily young adults. Because of purulent nature it is treated with surgery only.

Traditional surgical techniques encompass midline excision of the purulent cyst and either leaving the wound "lay open" for secondary closure or midline primary closure. The latter method has a major drawback of high recurrence rate and very long healing and patient disability periods. Therefore alternative techniques to close the wound after pilonidal sinus excision were proposed. In some a muscular-cutaneous flaps are created and the wound is closed in a Z- or Y- or other shape manner. The recurrence rate of these techniques is significantly lower than with a traditional midline closure, but healing time and final cosmetic results are far from ideal in patient view.

Recently a new method of wound closure was developed independently by a few groups that includes bilateral mobilisation of gluteus maximus muscles fascia and midline closure of the wound. Preliminary results demonstrated that this method leads to lower recurrence rate and better cosmetic results because the natal cleft is saved.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
84
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Written informed consent
  2. Chronic primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus at the remission stage.
  3. Presence or absence of secondary orifices.
  4. Planned surgical treatment with excision of pilonidal sinus.
  5. Location of secondary orifices less than 2 cm from the natal cleft.
  6. The distance between bilateral symmetrical secondary orifices less than 2 cm.
  7. American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1 to 3

Non-inclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute pilonidal sinus abscess.
  2. The secondary openings (orifice) position more than 2 cm from the midline.
  3. ASA 4-5.
  4. Predictable impossibility of following the protocol.
  5. Pregnancy

Exclusion criteria:

1 The patients lost for the further observation. 2. The patient's refusal to continue participate in the investigation.

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Primary ClosurePrimary ClosureAfter pilonidal sinus is excised, subcutaneous fat and skin are closed in midline with a running suture
Gluteus Maximus Plasty FlapGluteus Maximus Fascia Plasty FlapAfter pilonidal sinus is excised, gluteus maximus fascia flaps will be mobilised, approximated in the midline and fixed with a running suture. Subcutaneous fat and skin are closed in midline with a running suture.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recurrence ratestarting from 6 months after surgery and up to 5 years after surgery

The rate of disease recurrence (clinical picture of pilonidal sinus and/or appearance of new openings in the intergluteal cleft and/or chronic unhealing wound and/or residual cavity in the wound area as confirmed by the soft tissue ultrasound)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Operative time1 day

The length of surgery in minutes

Postoperative pain intensity - late postoperative periodOn 10th, 14th, 21st, 30 day after surgery

Pain intensity will be evaluated once a day with a patient-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing intolerable pain. A total score will be recorded.

Overall quality of life1-7 days before surgery, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years after surgery

Assessed with patient-reported questionnaire SF-36. A total score in each of 8 sections will be calculated and transformed into a 0-100 scale with a score of zero equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 equivalent to no disability

Bloodloss1 day

The amount of blood lost during surgery

Wound seroma rate90 days after surgery

The rate of seroma detection in the wound area as confirmed by soft tissues ultrasound

Wound healing rate6 months after surgery

The proportion of patients having their wound completely healed

Postoperative pain intensity - early postoperative periodOn 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th postoperative day

Pain intensity will be evaluated twice a day (in the morning and in the evening) with a patient-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing intolerable pain. A total score will be recorded.

Surgical site infection rate3 month after surgery

The rate of infectious inflammation of the wound as confirmed by the observing doctor

Inhospital stay30 days

The duration of treatment after surgery untill discharge from the hospital (in days)

Wound hemorrhage rateWithin 30 days from surgery

The rate of hemorrhage from wound edges

Wound healing speed5 years after surgery

The time period between surgery and complete healing of the wound

Secondary surgery rate5 years

The rate of surgical procedures after initial surgery performed for recurrent disease and/or wound complications

Patient satisfaction with cosmetic results6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years after surgery

Patient-reported with a scale 0-10, where 0 corresponds to "completely unsatisfactory" and 10 corresponds to "completely satisfactory". A total score is registered.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Clinic of Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery - I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath