跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01364610
NCT01364610已完成不适用

A Prospective Assessment of pH Testing Methods in Alberta

University of Calgary2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 86 人开始时间: 2008年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
86
试验地点
2
主要终点
Overall discomfort with standard vs. Bravo pH-metry.

研究概览

简要总结

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and potentially debilitating disorder. Typical symptoms include heartburn and regurgitation of acid tasting substances. GERD is a chronic disease and in some cases, more alarming symptoms including food sticking in the esophagus, pain with swallowing, bleeding, anemia and weight loss develop.

In Alberta, upper endoscopy is the first line of investigation accompanied by an ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring for patients with symptoms that are unresponsive to acid-suppressing therapy or who exhibit alarm symptoms.

Current standard of care in Alberta for esophageal pH monitoring first requires an esophageal manometry test to identify the location of the lower esophageal sphincter followed by the placement of a thin catheter with one or more pH probes inserted through the nose and taped in place to the face for 20 -24 hours. The patient wears a small battery powered data logger and maintains a diary of GERD symptoms and activity. This system enables the recording and correlation of specific symptoms with reflux episodes over extended periods and provides direct evidence of GERD. The nasally passed pH catheter is uncomfortable and restrictive for some patients often resulting in abnormal eating, drinking, activity and sleeping patterns. The data collected may not be representative of the patient's typical experience and may not reflect the true severity of the disease.

A wireless diagnostic pH monitoring system called Bravo pH Monitoring System developed by Medtronic is approved for use in Canada and is commercially available. This system eliminates the need for a catheter by utilizing a capsule the size of a gel-cap and radio frequency technology to monitor esophageal pH. It has been shown to be safe and as sensitive as conventional catheter-based pH probe monitoring. The Bravo system can be sited either endoscopically or manometrically.

The goal of this study is to test the Bravo Wireless pH system in Alberta using manometric siting to assess feasibility, patient outcomes and tolerance.

Hypotheses:

  1. Patient tolerance of the Bravo system is superior to standard pH-metry.
  2. Manometric placement of Bravo is as successful as standard pH-metry.

Our aims:

  1. To assess patient tolerance of Bravo versus standard pH-metry.
  2. To compare the success rate of manometric peroral placement of Bravo pH probe versus standard pH-metry.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Age 18 - 75 years
  • •Able to provide written consent
  • •Symptoms potentially due to acid reflux and referred for an ambulatory pH study as part of routine clinical care
  • •Able and willing to potentially undergo peroral Bravo placement
  • •Able to communicate adequately with the investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study

排除标准

  • •Previous esophageal surgery, or any known anatomic or functional defect of the digestive tract that might make capsule passage or retrieval unsafe
  • •Clinical evidence (including physical exam and/or EKG) of significant cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hematological, neurological, psychiatric or other disease that may interfere with the objectives of the study and/or pose safety concerns
  • •Allergy to topical anesthetic
  • •Any implanted electrical device such as a pacemaker, defibrillator or neurostimulator
  • •Pregnant or breast-feeding females

研究组 & 干预措施

Standard Care

Active Comparator

Group 1 will have standard catheter based pH-metry. All participants will answer a questionnaire assessing tolerance and satisfaction of both the siting and placement methods and the 24 hour monitoring period.

干预措施: Standard Care (Device)

Bravo pH Monitoring System

Active Comparator

Group 2 will undergo unsedated peroral placement of the Bravo capsule. All participants will answer a questionnaire assessing tolerance and satisfaction of both the siting and placement methods and the 24 hour pH monitoring period.

干预措施: Bravo (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Overall discomfort with standard vs. Bravo pH-metry.

时间窗: 24 hours

Mean overall discomfort from the pH-metry procedure between Group 1 (standard) and Group 2 (Bravo) as measured by questionnaire.

次要结局

  • Success rate of Bravo capsule placement(24 hours)
  • Site specific discomfort of both siting and placement procedures(24 hours)
  • Procedure Related Costs(24 hours)
  • Ability to do normal activities(24 hours)
  • Time off work(24 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Christopher Andrews

Principal Investigator

University of Calgary

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

An Assessment of pH Testing Methods | 临床试验