Follow-up of Post-spinal Implantable Neurostimulator PRECISION®
- Conditions
- Chronic Refractory Neuropathic PainIschemic Peripheral Pain
- Interventions
- Device: Neurostimulator Precision
- Registration Number
- NCT02208999
- Lead Sponsor
- Cemka-Eval
- Brief Summary
Assessing the long-term efficacy, complications, revision rates and final explantation of the device
- Detailed Description
Longitudinal study with a follow-up of 2 years in patients implanted with the Precision neurostimulator.
This study will describe the characterisrics of the patients, of the implantation and will assess the long-term efficacy, complications, revision rates and final explantation of the device
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 106
- Adult patient receiving spinal implantation of a neurostimulator PRECISION ® ( primary implantation or reimplantation)
- Refusal of patient
- Patient whose long-term monitoring will not be possible
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Neurostimulator Precision Neurostimulator Precision Patients implanted or reimplanted with the neurostimulator Precision
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Implanted Patients (de Novo Implants) With an Improvement of at Least 50% of the Overall Average Pain Over the Last 8 Days, Evaluated by Numerical Scale at the First Follow-up Visit, at 1 Year, and 2 Years. From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months. Percentage of patients (de novo implants) having a reduction of usual pain over the past 8 days of at least 50% at 12 and 24 months. The pain was measured with a numerical scale from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = most intense pain). This data has been provided by 71 patients at 1 year and by 70 patients at 2 years.
Average Pain Score Over the Last 8 Days, Evaluated by Numerical Scale at 1 Year, and at 2 Years. From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months. The pain was evaluated with a numerical scale from 0 to 10. 0 = no pain and 10 = most intense pain. This data has been provided by 71 patients at 1 year and by 70 patients at 2 years.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Implanted Patients (de Novo Implants) With an Improvement of at Least 30% of the Overall Average Pain, Evaluated by Numerical Scale From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months Percentage of implanted patients (de novo implants) with an improvement of at least 30% at 12 and 24 months after inclusion for:
* pain at the present time
* usual pain over the past 8 days
* the most severe pain in the last 8 daysPatients' Opinion on the Evolution of Pain From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months - Pain relief compared to what the patient with a de novo implant, felt before the implantation at 12 months and at 24 months.
Evolution of Quality of Life (SF-12) - Physical Score From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months Percentage of de novo patients with an increase of SF-12 (Short-Form health survey) physical score at 12 and 24 months. An increase of this score indicates an improvement in physical "quality of life.
Percentage of Patients With Anxiety and Depression Disorders From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months Evolution of the rate of patients with anxiety and depression disorders at12 and 24 months.
Patients' Willingness to Restart the Treatment From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months Patients' willingness to restart the treatment at 12 months and at 24 months.
Evolution of Quality of Life (SF-12) - Mental Score From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months Percentage of de novo patients with an increase of SF-12 (Short-Form health survey) mental score at 12 and 24 months. An increase of this score indicates an improvement in mental "quality of life.
Evolution of the Use of Level 3 Analgesics From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months Mean posology of level 3 analgesics at each follow-up (at 1 year and at 2 years). The posology was estimated in oral morphine equivalent dosage. At 1 year, 14 patients had a level 3 analgesic and at 2 years 18 patients had this type of analgesic. The posology was available for respectively 4 and 16 patients
Evolution of the Use of Other Pain Treatments From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months Rate of primary implanted patients who took at least one analgesic treatment at each follow-up (at 1 year and at 2 years)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospitals implanting the neurostimulator Precision
🇫🇷Multiple Locations, France