Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03571334
NCT03571334RecruitingPhase 2

Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Medical College of Wisconsin1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: July 8, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Improvement in pain from baseline at eight weeks as measured by the change in Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of taxanes and platinum derivative based chemotherapeutic agents, common in breast cancer treatment regimens. It can have a significant effect on both quality of life and treatment outcomes, often resulting in dose modifications and early treatment discontinuation. The use of IncobotulinumtoxinA (INA) ((Xeomin®, Merz) has recently been shown to be effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain via inhibiting the release of several neurotransmitters involved in pain signaling pathway.

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy and safety of intradermal INA injections for treatment of CIPN in breast cancer patients. The study will recruit a total of 40 participants, randomly assigned to receive either INA (Experimental group, n=20) or saline placebo injections (Control group n=20).

Potential participants who have received chemotherapy for breast cancer will be screened for the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy. After obtaining informed consent, participants will be further screened with the DN4 questionnaire, a clinician administered questionnaire that has a high level of sensitivity and specificity in discriminating neuropathic pain. Those study participants who score ≥4 on this tool will undergo nerve conduction studies to confirm the presence of peripheral neuropathy. Recruited study participants will then be randomized to treatment or control groups; the treatment group will undergo intradermal injections of INA (100 Units INA, total volume 5ml), and the control groups will undergo placebo injection with preservative-free normal saline (equal volume, 5mL). Total injection volume will be divided evenly and injected intradermally into a total of 50 sites on either the feet or hands (25 sites per limb).

The primary outcome will be the assessment of pain using the neuropathic pain scale (NPS) prior to intervention and at eight weeks post intervention. Secondary outcomes will include the change in NPS for each domain at additional time points: 2weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, the change in the Neuropathic Pain Impact on Quality of Life (NePIQoL) score at time points: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and the incidence of treatment related adverse events within each cohort. Statistical analysis will be utilized to determine whether the injection of intradermal INA is effective in improving pain as measured by the NPS scales vs placebo.

We hypothesize that the study participants treated with INA will have lower NPS scores as compared to placebo.

Detailed Description

Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse effect of cancer therapy, effecting over half of all patients who receive chemotherapy. CIPN typically manifests as a symmetrical, predominately sensory peripheral neuropathy, and is most common in taxanes, vinca-alkaloids, and/or platinum compounds. Taxanes are microtubule stabilizing agents and are effective in the treatment of many solid organ cancers, often used as first line therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Taxanes cause peripheral neuropathy by injuring neurons, disrupting axonal transport, and causing wide spread macrophage activation both in the periphery as well as at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and microglial activation in the spinal cord. The incidence of CIPN is high following taxane administration, and often occurs before patients have completed the prescribed course. In severe cases it can lead to dose modifications and early treatment discontinuation, effecting overall survivorship. Additionally, it has been demonstrated to have a profound effect on quality of life, found to correlate with increased fatigue, malaise, increased psychological distress and a less sense of well being and satisfaction with life. Current treatment options are inadequate, with suboptimal treatment effect size and dose limiting adverse effects. Various neuroprotective regimens have been trialed, including co-administration of thiols, neurotrophic factors, antioxidants and vitamin E; however none of these approaches are consistently effective in reducing peripheral neuropathy.

Botulinum Toxin (BoNT) Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is routinely used to treat a wide variety of disorders, traditionally by decreasing muscle activity through inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from the presynaptic nerve terminal. There has been a recent increase and growing body of evidence for the use of botulinum toxin in the treatment of neuropathic pain including postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic neuropathy, complex regional pain syndrome, trigeminal neuralgia, phantom limb pain, spinal cord injury-induced neuropathic pain, and central post-stroke pain.

The mechanism by which BoNT effects neuropathic pain is independent than the effect of BoNT on muscle relaxation. There are several proposed mechanisms by which BoNT decreases neuropathic pain, all of which likely contributing to the antinociceptive effect. First, it has been shown that BoNT inhibits the release of sensory neurotransmitters such as substance P, calcitonin gene related peptide, and glutamate from nerve endings into the peripheral nerve terminal. This not only directly mediates pain, but has also been shown to result in decreased inflammation. In addition, recent work in the rat model suggests that the antinociceptive mechanism of BoNT may in part be due to a reduction of TRPV1 expression. TRPV1 is a well-known pain receptor which responds to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimuli, is heavily expressed on the DRG. BoNT has been shown to exhibit retrograde axonal transport from the periphery, so effects on the DRG and central nervous system cannot be overlooked and likely play a role in the mechanism.

Recently, intradermal BoNT injections were found efficacious in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Multiple studies have demonstrated a reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores following intradermal BoNT injections on the dorsal aspect of the foot in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy. Similar to CIPN, diabetic neuropathy presents in a stocking-glove distribution with a predominant sensory neuropathy. BoNT has additionally been proven to be safe and efficacious when used specifically in a cohort of head, neck, and breast cancer patients who developed post surgical and post radiation neuropathic pain. In this study, affected patients underwent intradermal BoNT injections which resulted in improvement in VAS and clinical global impressions of change (CGI-C) scales. Together, this evidence suggests that intradermal BoNT injections are efficacious in the treatment of neuropathic pain, and is safe for use in the cancer population. If our hypothesis proves correct, we will demonstrate the efficacy of BoNT for treatment of CIPN, allowing for improved treatment options. An antihyperalgesic effect following intradermal BoNT injections was additionally observed in rats with Paclitaxel induced peripheral neuropathy, again suggesting that BoNT will be an effective treatment specifically in the CIPN patient population.

In controlled studies, BoNT has consistently demonstrated a minimal adverse effect profile. Typically, adverse effects occur within one week of BoNT injection and are transient. As with any injection, localized pain, infection, bleeding may be associated. A metaanalysis of two studies using BoNT for the treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain concluded that there were no statistically significant adverse effects associated with BoNT treatment. Intradermal injections for the treatment of hyperhidrosis have FDA approval, and the most common adverse events associated (3-10% of adult patients) were injection site pain and hemorrhage.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Been diagnosed with breast cancer and undergone treatment with taxane based chemotherapeutic agents. Patients with metastatic and non metastatic disease are eligible.
  • Have neuropathic pain with onset within 6 months of chemotherapy
  • Must score >4 on DN4 scale, a scale with high specificity and sensitivity for differentiating neuropathic pain from somatic and nociceptive pain
  • Age >18 years, male and/or female
  • Ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it.

Exclusion Criteria

  • End Stage Renal Disease patients on Hemodialysis
  • Female participants who are pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test), who have an infant they are breastfeeding, or intend to become pregnant within 6 months.
  • History of peripheral neuropathy attributed to any cause other than chemotherapy
  • Currently receiving chemotherapy, or having had received chemotherapy in the past 6 months
  • Prior treatment with Botulinum Toxin A for any indication within the past 6 months
  • Changes in neuropathic pain modulators within 1 month prior to enrollment or during the course of the trial. Participants who require rescue medications for breakthrough pain can be given so at the discretion of their provider.
  • Hypersensitivity reaction to INA injection
  • Distal muscle weakness and/or atrophy
  • Active infection at injection site

Arms & Interventions

IncobotulinumtoxinA

Experimental

IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®, Merz) (INA) will be reconstituted with preservative-free normal saline to a dilution of 5mL:100 units.

Study participants in this arm will receive 50u INA (total volume 2.5mL) injected into each limb, max 2 limbs per subject (either bilateral hands or bilateral feet.)

Hands: INA will be injected across the palmar surface of the digits in a grid like pattern covering a total of 25 sites per limb (0.1mL/site).

Feet: INA will be injected across the dorsal surface of the feet also in a grid like pattern covering a total of 25 sites per limb (0.1mL/site).

Intervention: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®, Merz) (INA) (Drug)

saline control

Placebo Comparator

Study participants in this arm will 2.5mL normal saline injected into each limb, max 2 limbs per subject (either bilateral hands or bilateral feet.)

Hands: saline will be injected across the palmar surface of the digits in a grid like pattern covering a total of 25 sites per limb (0.1mL/site).

Feet: Saline will be injected across the dorsal surface of the feet also in a grid like pattern covering a total of 25 sites per limb (0.1mL/site).

Intervention: Normal saline (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Improvement in pain from baseline at eight weeks as measured by the change in Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)

Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks

The primary outcome of this study will be the change pain as measured by the NPS at 8 weeks post intervention as compared to baseline NPS scores. The NPS is a validated scale that is used to classify patient's neuropathic pain. It includes assessment of global pain intensity and pain unpleasantness, two items addressing the location of the pain as deep or surface, and six items addressing the specific qualities of neuropathic such as sharp, hot, dull, cold, sensitivity, and itchy.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in quality of life as measured by the Neuropathic Pain Impact on Quality of Life (NePIQoL) score(2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post intervention)
  • Change in pain characteristics as measured by the change in each individual domain of Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)(baseline and 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months)
  • Safety as measured by self reporting of incidence of treatment related adverse events(2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post intervention)
  • Improvement in pain from baseline as measured by the change in Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)(baseline and 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Erin McGonigle

Assistant Professor

Medical College of Wisconsin

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials