跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05606224
NCT05606224招募中不适用

The Effects and Mechanisms of Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Peking University4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2022年2月20日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
4
主要终点
Change of mindfulness

研究概览

简要总结

Traditional offline interventions such as MBCT and MBSR have been implemented in treating patients with emotional disorders and obtained significantly improved clinical outcome. However, these offline interventions require the involvement of a therapist expertized in mindfulness and usually charge a high fee, which may not be accessible and cost-effective for lots of patients with psychological disorders. Fortunately, online self-help interventions can compensate for these disadvantages. Our research team has developed a self-help online mindfulness program targeting emotional distress (i.e., MIED), which has been demonstrated to be effective for individuals with emotional distress in a preliminary study. Since patients with emotional disorders usually suffered from emotional distress, the current study will apply this program to these patients, and investigate its auxiliary effects on patients' psychological and physical health.

The primary aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of MIED for patients with emotional disorders. To do so, we will use a design in which patients who receive online mindfulness training (MIED) except for treatment as usual (TAU) will be compared with patients who receive TAU alone. We expect the intervention to improve patients' psychopathological symptoms reported by the patients and the clinicians or the research team and increase their overall functioning, positive mental health, and physical health compared to TAU. In addition, previous studies have shown that mindfulness interventions improve psychological symptoms through improving cognitive flexibility, distress tolerance, intolerance of uncertainty, and experiential avoidance. Therefore, the secondary aim of the study is to examine the mediating effect of these factors on the relationships between mindfulness practice and improvements in outcome variables.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18-65;
  • Diagnosis of emotional disorders, including anxiety disorders (e.g., panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder), and unipolar depression disorders;
  • If taking medication, haven't changed for at least 4 weeks before intervention onset, and no change in medicine is expected;
  • Voluntary participation in this study and sign an informed consent form.

排除标准

  • No access to the internet;
  • Inadequate proficiency in Chinese;
  • Previous participation in mindfulness-based programs longer than 6 weeks, and/or current practice of meditation more than once per week;
  • A history of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, current organic mental disorders, substance abuse disorder, and pervasive developmental disorders;
  • Manifesting with any self-injury or suicidal risks.

结局指标

主要结局

Change of mindfulness

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

The 20-item Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form, self-report, score s range from 20 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness

Change of other-reported anxiety

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, assessed by the clinicians, scores range from 0 to 56, higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety

Change of other-reported depression

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, assessed by the clinicians, scores range from 0 to 68, higher scores indicate higher levels of depression

Change of self-reported depression

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Beck Depression Inventory-II, self-report, scores range from 0 to 63, higher scores indicate higher levels of depression

Change of sleep quality

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, self-report, scores range from 0 to 21, higher scores indicate worse sleep quality

Change of Depression Severity and Impairment

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale, self-report, scores range from 0 to 20, higher scores indicate higher levels of depression severity and impairment

Change of self-reported anxiety symptoms

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Beck Anxiety Inventory, self-report, scores range from 0 to 63, higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety

Change of Intolerance of Uncertainty

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Intolerance of Uncertainty -Short form, self-report, scores range from 12 to 60, higher scores indicate higher levels of intolerance of uncertainty

Change of Cognitive Flexibility

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Cognitive Flexibility Inventory, self-report, scores range from 20 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of cognitive flexibility

Change of psychological distress

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, self-report, scores range from 5 to 50, higher scores indicate higher levels of psychological distress

Change of distress tolerance

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

The Chinese version of the Distress Tolerance Scale, self-report, scores range from 15 to 75 higher scores indicate higher levels of distress tolerance

Change of attention control

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Attention Control Scale, self-report, scores range from 16 to 64 higher scores indicate higher levels of attention control

Change of inner peace

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Inner Peace Scale, self-report, scores range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicate higher levels of inner peace

Change of perceived stress

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Chinese Perceived Stress Scales, self-report, scores range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicate higher levels of inner peace

Change of Anxiety Severity and Impairment

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale, self-report, scores range from 0 to 20, higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety severity and impairment

Change of somatic symptoms

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Patient Health Questionnaire-15, self-report, scores range from 0 to 30 higher scores indicate higher levels of somatic symptoms

Change of experiential avoidance

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Brief Experience Avoidance Questionnaire, self-report, scores range from 15 to 75 higher scores indicate higher levels of experiential avoidance

Change of discomfort intolerance

时间窗: at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups

Discomfort intolerance Scale, self-report, scores range from 0 to 25 higher scores indicate higher levels of discomfort intolerance

次要结局

  • Change of distress tolerance (behavioral indicator2)(at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups)
  • Change of distress tolerance (behavioral indicator1)(at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups)
  • Change of distress tolerance (behavioral indicator3)(at baseline (T0), at week 3(T1) and at week 5 (T2), at post-intervention (T3), and at 3 (T4) months follow-ups)

研究者

发起方
Peking University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Xinghua Liu

Director

Peking University

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验