A Platform for Multidisciplinary Medical Artificial Intelligence Development
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 200
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- annotation accuracy
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Biomedical deep learning (DL) often relies heavily on generating reliable labels for large-scale data and highly technical requirements for model training. To efficiently develop DL models, we established an integrated platform to introduce automation to both annotation and model training-the primary process of DL model development. Based on this platform, we quantitively validated and compared the annotation strategy and AI model development with the pure manual annotation method performed on medical image datasets from multiple disciplines.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Case Control
- Time Perspective
- Cross Sectional
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •have medical imaging record (including ophthalmology, pathology, radiography, blood cells, and endoscopy)
Exclusion Criteria
- •unqualified medical imaging
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
annotation accuracy
Time Frame: baseline
calculate annotation accuracy for comparison between groups with using the annotation results
Secondary Outcomes
- AUC of model performance(baseline)
- accuracy of model performance(baseline)
- annotation time cost(baseline)
Investigators
Haotian Lin
Principal Investigator
Sun Yat-sen University
