A Clinical Randomized Controlled RSA Trial Comparing the Cemented ATTUNE Fixed Bearing Cruciate Retaining Knee System with the Cemented PFC Sigma Fixed Bearing Cruciate Retaining Knee System
- Conditions
- Artificial Knee JointTotal Knee Arthroplasty10023213
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON47832
- Lead Sponsor
- eids Universitair Medisch Centrum
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 64
Age: 21- 90 years Indications: Patient is diagnosed with osteoarthritis or
rheumatoid arthritis and requiring primary knee arthroplasty
The patient has an a-priori risk for a posterior-stabilized total knee
arthroplasty.
Insufficiency of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)
Status after patellectomy
In case flexion is less than 90 degrees
When it is expected that the tibia cut during surgery will compromise the
attachment of the PCL (because of bony defects)
The patient is unable or unwilling to sign the Informed Consent specific to
this study The patient does not understand the Dutch or English language good
enough to participate Patients indicated for revision arthroplasty When there
are not enough markers visible in the baseline RSA photograph and it will not
improve by placing the patient in another position, the patient will
be excluded from the study (secondary exclusion criteria). s=fieldla
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Migration, measured by means of RSA. </p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Patient Reported Outcome Measures by means of questionaires. </p><br>
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.